Paper · 2019 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Life Cycle Assessment of Irrigated Wheat Production under the Effects of Nitrogen Amounts and Splitting its Use in Boushehr Region

Morteza Siavoshi; Salman Dastan

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Life cycle assessment is an appropriate method to study the environmental impacts of producing a crop plant throughout its production cycle. This research was conducted with the aim of evaluating the life cycle of irrigated wheat production under nitrogen amounts and splitting in Bushehr province during 2017-18The as split plots based on a randomized complete blocks design with four replications. Four nitrogen rates including 70, 140, 210 and 280 kg urea ha-1 was considered as main plots and three nitrogen splitting in basal, beginning of tillering, stem elongation and booting stages was chosen as sub plot.The results demonstrated that with increase of nitrogen application an amount of cumulative energy demand, cumulative energy demand, acidification, eutrophiction and malodorous air were decreased. The average amount of ecological footprint was 1125.87 m2 per year which CO2 emissions had shown the highest effect on the ecological footprint. The average amount of global warming potential (GWP) was 20a and GWP 500a were 400.53 and 384.30 kg CO2 eq, respectively. All pollutants released into the air and the water experienced a decreasing trend with increasing nitrogen rate. By group comparing between different levels of nitrogen at splitting levels, it can be stated that the main cause of variations in the amount of pollutants was the higher output (yield) compared to inputs. Indeed, nitrogen application in four developmental stages has resulted in maximum plant use, resulting in increased yield and emission reduction per unit area. Therefore, reducing the emission of pollutants by increasing nitrogen consumption can be due to yield increasing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen decreased cumulative energy demand, acidification, eutrophication, and malodorous air impacts.

Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
cumulative energy demand, cumulative energy demand, acidification, eutrophiction and malodorous aire0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with increase of nitrogen application an amount of cumulative energy demand, cumulative energy demand, acidification, eutrophiction and malodorous air were decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average ecological footprint was 1125.87 m2 per year.

Outcome
ecological footprinte0
Value
1125.87 m2 per yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average amount of ecological footprint was 1125.87 m2 per year which CO2 emissions had shown the highest effect on the ecological footprint.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 emissions had the highest contribution to ecological footprint.

Compound
CO2 emissionse0
Outcome
effect on the ecological footprinte0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average amount of ecological footprint was 1125.87 m2 per year which CO2 emissions had shown the highest effect on the ecological footprint.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average 20-year GWP was 400.53 kg CO2 eq.

Outcome
global warming potential (GWP)e0
Value
400.53 and 384.30 kg CO2 eqe0
Qualifier
20ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average amount of global warming potential (GWP) was 20a and GWP 500a were 400.53 and 384.30 kg CO2 eq, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen reduced pollutants released to air and water.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
pollutants released into the air and the watere0
Direction
decreasing trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All pollutants released into the air and the water experienced a decreasing trend with increasing nitrogen rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation in pollutant amounts across nitrogen and splitting levels was attributed to higher yield relative to inputs.

Outcome
variations in the amount of pollutantse0
Qualifier
higher output (yield) compared to inputse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the main cause of variations in the amount of pollutants was the higher output (yield) compared to inputs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen applied at four developmental stages increased yield.

Treatment
nitrogen application in four developmental stagese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen application in four developmental stages has resulted in maximum plant use, resulting in increased yield and emission reduction per unit area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen applied at four developmental stages reduced emissions per unit area.

Treatment
nitrogen application in four developmental stagese0
Outcome
emission reduction per unit areae0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen application in four developmental stages has resulted in maximum plant use, resulting in increased yield and emission reduction per unit area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 19 positive, 10 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.