Paper · 2020 · Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources

Efficacy of fungicides in management of Downy mildew disease of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under open field conditions, in Dhading district of Nepal

Shailesh Pandit; Hira Kaji Manandhar; Krishna Hari Dhakal; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis) is one of the most important disease of cucumber under open field conditions. Hence, the experiment was conducted to study the efficacy of fungicides in management of downy mildew disease of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under open field in Chauradi-7 Dhading during spring season, 2019. Bhaktapur local variety of cucumber was used for the study. The experiment was laid out in single factor randomized complete block design with four replications. Three different bio-fungicides; Trichoderma viride + Trichoderma harzianum, Bacillus subtilis, Verticillium lecanii and one chemical fungicide; Krilaxyl (metalaxyl 8% + mancozeb 64%) were used as treatments. Normal water spray served as control. It was observed that bio-fungicides had insignificant effect in controlling the downy mildew. Pathological observation such as disease incidence percentage, severity percentage and AUDPC in bio-fungicides treated plots were not significantly different from water-sprayed control plots. Similarly, biometric attributes such as number of fruit, length and diameter of fruit, weight of fruit were also non-significant. Krilaxyl resulted significant effect in controlling downy mildew, providing maximum disease reduction (37.48%-50.72%) with lowest disease incidence (1.25-61.25%) and lowest value of AUDPC (138.7). Krilaxyl treated plots had higher number of fruit (6), longer length of fruit (17.15-18.95), higher diameter of fruit (4.16- 4.45 cm) and higher weight of fruit (677 - 759 g). Hence, chemical fungicide Krilaxyl was found better for the management of downy mildew disease in open field cucumber cultivation. Further, researches on bio-fungicides, especially of native strains are required for best result.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fungicides did not significantly change downy mildew incidence, severity or AUDPC relative to water spray.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
bio-fungicidese0
Interactor
Pseudoperonospora cubensisPseudoperonospora cubensise1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence percentage, severity percentage and AUDPCe0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
water-sprayed control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudoperonospora cubensis
Pseudoperonospora cubensis · InteractorChristian Hummert ( Ixitixel ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence percentage, severity percentage and AUDPC in bio-fungicides treated plots were not significantly different from water-sprayed control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Downy mildew disease of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fungicides did not significantly change fruit number, dimensions or weight.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
bio-fungicidest1
Outcome
number of fruit, length and diameter of fruit, weight of fruite0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of fruit, length and diameter of fruit, weight of fruit were also non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“bio-fungicides treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Krilaxyl reduced downy mildew by 37.48%-50.72%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Krilaxyle0
Outcome
disease reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
37.48%-50.72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Krilaxyl resulted significant effect in controlling downy mildew, providing maximum disease reduction (37.48%-50.72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Krilaxyl plots had the lowest downy mildew incidence, 1.25-61.25%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Krilaxylt1
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.25-61.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest disease incidence (1.25-61.25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“Krilaxyl treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Krilaxyl plots had the lowest AUDPC, 138.7.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Krilaxylt1
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
138.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest value of AUDPC (138.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“Krilaxyl treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Krilaxyl plots had more fruit, with a reported count of 6.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Krilaxyle0
Outcome
number of fruite0
Direction
highere0
Value
6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Krilaxyl treated plots had higher number of fruit (6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Krilaxyl plots had longer fruit, 17.15-18.95.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Krilaxylt1
Outcome
length of fruite0
Direction
longere0
Value
17.15-18.95e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longer length of fruit (17.15-18.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“Krilaxyl treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Krilaxyl plots had wider fruit, 4.16- 4.45 cm.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Krilaxylt1
Outcome
diameter of fruite0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.16- 4.45 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher diameter of fruit (4.16- 4.45 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“Krilaxyl treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Krilaxyl plots had heavier fruit, 677 - 759 g.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Krilaxylt1
Outcome
weight of fruite0
Direction
highere0
Value
677 - 759 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher weight of fruit (677 - 759 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“Krilaxyl treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1373 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favored Krilaxyl for field management of cucumber downy mildew.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
Krilaxyl was found better for the management of downy mildew diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chemical fungicide Krilaxyl was found better for the management of downy mildew disease in open field cucumber cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1656 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · Pseudoperonospora cubensis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.