Paper · 2005

Sugarcane cultivar yield response to planting date

Ryan P. Viator; Edward P. Richard; D. D. Garrison; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

As Louisiana farms continue to get larger and more diversified, more sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) acreage is being planted both earlier and later in the cropping season. This research was initiated to determine if the yields of five cultivars were affected by August, September, and October planting dates in Louisiana. CP 70-321, LHo 83-153, CP 79-318, LCP 85-384, and HoCP 85-845 were hand-planted during mid-Aug., mid-Sept., and mid-Oct. in 1996-1999. Data collected at harvest included stalk number and weight, cane yield, sucrose concentration, and sugar yield. For the plant-cane crops, optimum sugar yields for CP 70-321, LHo 83-153, and HoCP 85-845 were obtained with an August planting. These cultivars had similar yields with September and October plantings. The plant-cane sugar yield with the August planting for these cultivars averaged 14.4 Mg ha-1 compared with 12.4 and 11.4 Mg ha-1 for the September and October plantings, respectively. Higher sucrose concentration and higher stalk populations for the August planting contributed to this yield increase. Planting date did not affect cane or sugar yields of the plant-cane crops of LCP 85-384 and CP 79-318. For HoCP 85-845, the October plantings produced ratoon cane yields that averaged 13.8 Mg ha-1 compared to 12.7 and 13.4 for the August and September plantings, respectively. Ratoon sugar yields were not affected by planting date for all other cultivars. Producers should attempt to plant sugarcane cultivars sensitive to planting date in August to insure stand establishment and optimum yields as the crop begins a production cycle that can last four to five years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August planting gave optimum plant-cane sugar yield for CP 70-321, LHo 83-153 and HoCP 85-845.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
CP 70-321, LHo 83-153, and HoCP 85-845e0
Treatment
August plantinge0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“optimum sugar yields for CP 70-321, LHo 83-153, and HoCP 85-845 were obtained with an August planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those cultivars had similar sugar yield under September and October planting.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
September and October plantingse0
Outcome
similar yieldse0

Verbatim

e0

“These cultivars had similar yields with September and October plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August plant-cane sugar yield averaged 14.4 Mg ha-1, compared with 12.4 and 11.4 Mg ha-1 for September and October.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
August plantinge0
Outcome
plant-cane sugar yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
14.4 Mg ha-1e0
Qualifier
12.4 and 11.4 Mg ha-1e0
Comparator
September and October plantingse0

Verbatim

e0

“The plant-cane sugar yield with the August planting for these cultivars averaged 14.4 Mg ha-1 compared with 12.4 and 11.4 Mg ha-1 for the September and October plantings, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August planting had higher sucrose concentration.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
August plantinge0
Outcome
sucrose concentratione0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Higher sucrose concentration and higher stalk populations for the August planting contributed to this yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August planting had higher stalk populations.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
August plantinge0
Outcome
stalk populationse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Higher sucrose concentration and higher stalk populations for the August planting contributed to this yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date did not affect plant-cane cane or sugar yields of LCP 85-384 and CP 79-318.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
LCP 85-384 and CP 79-318e0
Treatment
Planting datee0
Outcome
cane or sugar yieldse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Planting date did not affect cane or sugar yields of the plant-cane crops of LCP 85-384 and CP 79-318”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

October planting produced 13.8 Mg ha-1 ratoon cane yield for HoCP 85-845, compared with 12.7 and 13.4 under August and September planting.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
HoCP 85-845e0
Treatment
October plantingse0
Outcome
ratoon cane yieldse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
13.8 Mg ha-1e0
Qualifier
12.7 and 13.4e0
Comparator
August and September plantingse0

Verbatim

e0

“For HoCP 85-845, the October plantings produced ratoon cane yields that averaged 13.8 Mg ha-1 compared to 12.7 and 13.4 for the August and September plantings, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date did not affect ratoon sugar yields of other cultivars.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
planting datee0
Outcome
Ratoon sugar yieldse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Ratoon sugar yields were not affected by planting date for all other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Producers should plant cultivars sensitive to planting date in August.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
plant sugarcane cultivars sensitive to planting date in Auguste0

Verbatim

e0

“Producers should attempt to plant sugarcane cultivars sensitive to planting date in August to insure stand establishment and optimum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1573 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.