Paper · 2016

Effects of Lime, Blended Fertilizer (NPSB) and Compost on Yield and Yield Attributes of Barley (Hordium Vulgare L.) on Acid Soils of Wolmera District, West Showa, Ethiopia

Woubshet Demissie; Selamyihun Kidanu; Tolera Abera; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil acidity is a major yielding limiting factors in the highlands of Ethiopia wherehighly weathered acid soils. This in view a field experiment was executed toinvestigate the effect lime, blended fertilizer and compost application onproductivity of barley and soil fertility at Telecho, Wolmera district, in thehighlands of western Ethiopia in 2015 cropping season. The experiment consisted ofnine treatments which was laid out in a randomized complete block design with 3replicates. Lime requirement was determined based exchangeable acidity.Application of lime was dramatically improved soil pH from 3.80 to pH levelranging from 6.63 to 6.86. Yield and yield components of barley was significantly(p<0.05) affected by integrated use of lime, blended fertilizer and compost.Significantly higher yield 5386 kg ha -1 and nutrient uptake N (74), P (19.65), K(16.05) and S (15) kg ha -1 of barley were obtained with application of 611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1 . Higher net return EB 30633 ha -1with marginal rate of return of 667 % of barley was obtained with application of611kg lime + 2.5 t compost + 75 kg NPSB + 50 kg KCl +36 kg N ha -1 . Thus,integrated use of 611kg lime + 2.5 t compost + 75 kg NPSB + 50 kg KCl +36 kg N ha -1is recommended for barley production in acid soil of Telecho, Wolmera district andsimilar agroecologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated lime, fertilizer and compost significantly affected barley yield and yield components.

Treatment
integrated use of lime, blended fertilizer and composte0
Outcome
Yield and yield components of barleye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and yield components of barley was significantly(p<0.05) affected by integrated use of lime, blended fertilizer and compost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley (Hordium Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The full amendment treatment produced a barley yield of 5386 kg ha -1.

Treatment
611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5386 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher yield 5386 kg ha -1 and nutrient uptake N (74), P (19.65), K(16.05) and S (15) kg ha -1 of barley were obtained with application of 611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley (Hordium Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full amendment treatment produced barley nitrogen uptake of 74 kg ha -1.

Treatment
611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
nutrient uptake Ne0
Value
74e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake N (74), P (19.65), K(16.05) and S (15) kg ha -1 of barley were obtained with application of 611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley (Hordium Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full amendment treatment produced barley phosphorus uptake of 19.65 kg ha -1.

Treatment
611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Value
19.65e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake N (74), P (19.65), K(16.05) and S (15) kg ha -1 of barley were obtained with application of 611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley (Hordium Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full amendment treatment produced barley potassium uptake of 16.05 kg ha -1.

Treatment
611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Value
16.05e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake N (74), P (19.65), K(16.05) and S (15) kg ha -1 of barley were obtained with application of 611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley (Hordium Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full amendment treatment produced barley sulfur uptake of 15 kg ha -1.

Treatment
611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Value
15e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake N (74), P (19.65), K(16.05) and S (15) kg ha -1 of barley were obtained with application of 611kg lime + 5 tcompost + 150 kg NPSB + 100 kg KCl +72 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley (Hordium Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower amendment treatment yielded a barley net return of EB 30633 ha -1 and marginal return rate of 667%.

Treatment
611kg lime + 2.5 t compost + 75 kg NPSB + 50 kg KCl +36 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
Highere0
Value
EB 30633 ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher net return EB 30633 ha -1with marginal rate of return of 667 % of barley was obtained with application of611kg lime + 2.5 t compost + 75 kg NPSB + 50 kg KCl +36 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley (Hordium Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the lower amendment treatment for barley production in local acid soils.

Treatment
611kg lime + 2.5 t compost + 75 kg NPSB + 50 kg KCl +36 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
barley production in acid soil of Telecho, Wolmera district andsimilar agroecologiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated use of 611kg lime + 2.5 t compost + 75 kg NPSB + 50 kg KCl +36 kg N ha -1is recommended for barley production in acid soil of Telecho, Wolmera district andsimilar agroecologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley (Hordium Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑

potassium chloride · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

lime · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

54 papers: 53 positive, 1 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

299 papers: 252 positive, 47 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

295 papers more in this group

See all 299 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.