Paper · 2003 · Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Root Dimensions of Landscape Tree Cultivars

Henry Gerhold; Andra Johnson

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Entire root systems of 46 trees, consisting of eight utility-compatible cultivars in four genera, were excavated and measured as to length of longest roots, depth, and dry weight of roots inside and outside standard root ball sizes. Root lengths were longer along rows than across rows, were closely related to trunk diameter, and differed among genera. Roots of Syringa cultivars were up to twice as long as those of Amelanchier. Depths were more variable, and no differences were detected among genera. The most surprising finding was that 53% to 100% of root biomass would be retained within standard root balls of trees up to 6 cm dbh, and even 29% to 83% retained for trees up to 20 cm. In contrast, previous studies using different methods concluded that only 2% to 9% of roots would be retained in standard root ball sizes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root lengths were longer along rows than across rows.

Taxon
Treee0t0
Outcome
Root lengthse0t0
Direction
longere0t0
Comparator
across rowse0t0

Verbatim

e0

“Root lengths were longer along rows than across rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–285 · show in text ↑
t0

“Landscape Tree Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length was closely related to trunk diameter.

Taxon
Treee0e1t0
Organ / stage
trunke0e1t0
Outcome
Root lengthse0e1t0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“were closely related to trunk diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–325 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root lengths were longer along rows than across rows, were closely related to trunk diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–325 · show in text ↑
t0

“Landscape Tree Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root lengths differed among genera.

Taxon
Treee0t0
Outcome
Root lengthse0t0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Root lengths were longer along rows than across rows, were closely related to trunk diameter, and differed among genera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Landscape Tree Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Syringa roots were up to twice as long as Amelanchier roots.

Taxon
SyringaSyringae0
Material
Syringa cultivarse0
Outcome
Rootse0
Direction
longe0
Value
twicee0
Comparator
Amelanchiere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Syringa
Syringa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marisa DeMeglio from NYC, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Roots of Syringa cultivars were up to twice as long as those of Amelanchier.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root depths were more variable and showed no detected differences among genera.

Taxon
Treee0t0
Outcome
Depthse0t0
Direction
no differencese0t0

Verbatim

e0

“Depths were more variable, and no differences were detected among genera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“Landscape Tree Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For trees up to 6 cm dbh, standard root balls retained 53% to 100% of root biomass.

Taxon
Treee0t0
Outcome
root biomass would be retainede0t0
Value
53% to 100%e0t0
Qualifier
trees up to 6 cm dbhe0t0

Verbatim

e0

“53% to 100% of root biomass would be retained within standard root balls of trees up to 6 cm dbh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Landscape Tree Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For trees up to 20 cm, standard root balls retained 29% to 83% of root biomass.

Taxon
Treee0e1t0
Outcome
root biomass would be retainede0e1t0
Value
29% to 83%e0e1t0
Qualifier
trees up to 20 cme0e1t0

Verbatim

e0

“29% to 83% retained for trees up to 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“root biomass would be retained within standard root balls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Landscape Tree Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–43 · show in text ↑