Abstract
The analysis of long-term experimental data on growth and effi ciency of an apricot at cultivation on clonal stocks is submitted. It is shown, that in conditions of Moscow area apricot varieties had high winter hardiness and good fructifi cation. Development of plants, their effi ciency and durability was essentially infl uenced not only by the variety, but also the rootstock and the degree of their compatibility. There was marked the reduction of growth and dimensions of the crone in comparison with the seed stock of the cherry plum on the rootstock 140-1 and SVG-11-19. Acceleration of the introduction into fructifi cation was promoted by clonal rootstocks OD-2-3 and 140-1. The greatest effi ciency was characteristic for stock/scion combinations Samarskiy on OD-2-3, Samarskiy on 13-113, Lel on OD-2-3. Reduction of productivity and durability of trees on rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19 is connected with the deterioration of the general common condition of the plants, caused by winter damages and insuffi cient compatibility. For the multiplication of apricot northern varieties it is recommended to use the clonal rootstocks 13-113, OD-2-3 and the seed rootstock of the cherry plum Fundamentalnaya.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Apricot varieties had high winter hardiness and good fructification in the Moscow area.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacae1 - Outcome
- winter hardiness and good fructifi catione1
- Setting
- Moscow areae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“in conditions of Moscow area apricot varieties had high winter hardiness and good fructifi cation”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant development, efficiency and durability were influenced by the variety and by the rootstock and graft compatibility.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Treatment
- the rootstock and the degree of their compatibilitye2
- Outcome
- effi ciency and durabilitye2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“Development of plants, their effi ciency and durability was essentially infl uenced not only by the variety, but also the rootstock and the degree of their compatibility”
t0“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19 markedly reduced growth and crown dimensions compared with seed stock of cherry plum.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Treatment
- rootstock 140-1 and SVG-11-19e3
- Outcome
- growth and dimensions of the cronee3
- Direction
- reductione3
- Comparator
- seed stock of the cherry plume3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“There was marked the reduction of growth and dimensions of the crone in comparison with the seed stock of the cherry plum on the rootstock 140-1 and SVG-11-19”
t0“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Clonal rootstocks OD-2-3 and 140-1 accelerated the introduction of apricot into fruiting.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Treatment
- clonal rootstocks OD-2-3 and 140-1e4
- Outcome
- introduction into fructifi catione4
- Direction
- Acceleratione4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“Acceleration of the introduction into fructifi cation was promoted by clonal rootstocks OD-2-3 and 140-1”
t0“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The stock/scion combinations Samarskiy on OD-2-3, Samarskiy on 13-113 and Lel on OD-2-3 gave the greatest efficiency.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Material
- Samarskiy on OD-2-3, Samarskiy on 13-113, Lel on OD-2-3e5
- Outcome
- effi ciencye5
- Direction
- greateste5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“The greatest effi ciency was characteristic for stock/scion combinations Samarskiy on OD-2-3, Samarskiy on 13-113, Lel on OD-2-3”
t0“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Productivity and durability of trees on rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19 were reduced, linked to winter damage and poor compatibility.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Treatment
- rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19e6
- Outcome
- productivity and durability of treese6
- Direction
- Reductione6
- Qualifier
- winter damages and insuffi cient compatibilitye6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Reduction of productivity and durability of trees on rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19 is connected with the deterioration of the general common condition of the plants, caused by winter damages and insuffi cient compatibility”
t0“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Clonal rootstocks 13-113 and OD-2-3 and the seed rootstock Fundamentalnaya are recommended for multiplying northern apricot varieties.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacae7 - Material
- 13-113, OD-2-3 and the seed rootstock of the cherry plum Fundamentalnayae7
- Outcome
- multiplication of apricot northern varietiese7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e7“For the multiplication of apricot northern varieties it is recommended to use the clonal rootstocks 13-113, OD-2-3 and the seed rootstock of the cherry plum Fundamentalnaya”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · molecular: metabolites · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.