Paper · 2016 · Russian Agency for Digital Standardization

Peculiarities of growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants in Moscow area

Upadysheva, G.Yu.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The analysis of long-term experimental data on growth and effi ciency of an apricot at cultivation on clonal stocks is submitted. It is shown, that in conditions of Moscow area apricot varieties had high winter hardiness and good fructifi cation. Development of plants, their effi ciency and durability was essentially infl uenced not only by the variety, but also the rootstock and the degree of their compatibility. There was marked the reduction of growth and dimensions of the crone in comparison with the seed stock of the cherry plum on the rootstock 140-1 and SVG-11-19. Acceleration of the introduction into fructifi cation was promoted by clonal rootstocks OD-2-3 and 140-1. The greatest effi ciency was characteristic for stock/scion combinations Samarskiy on OD-2-3, Samarskiy on 13-113, Lel on OD-2-3. Reduction of productivity and durability of trees on rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19 is connected with the deterioration of the general common condition of the plants, caused by winter damages and insuffi cient compatibility. For the multiplication of apricot northern varieties it is recommended to use the clonal rootstocks 13-113, OD-2-3 and the seed rootstock of the cherry plum Fundamentalnaya.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apricot varieties had high winter hardiness and good fructification in the Moscow area.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae1
Outcome
winter hardiness and good fructifi catione1
Setting
Moscow areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in conditions of Moscow area apricot varieties had high winter hardiness and good fructifi cation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–245 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant development, efficiency and durability were influenced by the variety and by the rootstock and graft compatibility.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
the rootstock and the degree of their compatibilitye2
Outcome
effi ciency and durabilitye2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Development of plants, their effi ciency and durability was essentially infl uenced not only by the variety, but also the rootstock and the degree of their compatibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–416 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19 markedly reduced growth and crown dimensions compared with seed stock of cherry plum.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
rootstock 140-1 and SVG-11-19e3
Outcome
growth and dimensions of the cronee3
Direction
reductione3
Comparator
seed stock of the cherry plume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“There was marked the reduction of growth and dimensions of the crone in comparison with the seed stock of the cherry plum on the rootstock 140-1 and SVG-11-19”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clonal rootstocks OD-2-3 and 140-1 accelerated the introduction of apricot into fruiting.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
clonal rootstocks OD-2-3 and 140-1e4
Outcome
introduction into fructifi catione4
Direction
Acceleratione4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Acceleration of the introduction into fructifi cation was promoted by clonal rootstocks OD-2-3 and 140-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stock/scion combinations Samarskiy on OD-2-3, Samarskiy on 13-113 and Lel on OD-2-3 gave the greatest efficiency.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Material
Samarskiy on OD-2-3, Samarskiy on 13-113, Lel on OD-2-3e5
Outcome
effi ciencye5
Direction
greateste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The greatest effi ciency was characteristic for stock/scion combinations Samarskiy on OD-2-3, Samarskiy on 13-113, Lel on OD-2-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Productivity and durability of trees on rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19 were reduced, linked to winter damage and poor compatibility.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19e6
Outcome
productivity and durability of treese6
Direction
Reductione6
Qualifier
winter damages and insuffi cient compatibilitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Reduction of productivity and durability of trees on rootstocks 140-1 and SVG-11-19 is connected with the deterioration of the general common condition of the plants, caused by winter damages and insuffi cient compatibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth and fructifi cation of apricot plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Clonal rootstocks 13-113 and OD-2-3 and the seed rootstock Fundamentalnaya are recommended for multiplying northern apricot varieties.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae7
Material
13-113, OD-2-3 and the seed rootstock of the cherry plum Fundamentalnayae7
Outcome
multiplication of apricot northern varietiese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“For the multiplication of apricot northern varieties it is recommended to use the clonal rootstocks 13-113, OD-2-3 and the seed rootstock of the cherry plum Fundamentalnaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1211 · show in text ↑

grafting · molecular: metabolites · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.