Abstract
In Pakistan, powdery mildew of pea is an emerging pathogen to notable production of pea. The research was conducted to evaluate the currently available resistant source against the powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) and its management through nutrients (micronutrients and macronutrients) and plant activators (citric acid, benzoic acid, salicylic acid, K2HPO4, KH2PO4). Thirteen varieties/lines were grown under a randomized complete block design (RCBD). The data of disease incidence were examined at weekly intervals to evaluate the resistant source against this disease. Varieties/lines including No. 267, F-16, and Peas-2009 exhibited a resistant response to E. pisi with a disease incidence of 3.3, 6.6, and 1.6% respectively. The winner showed moderately resistant response with disease incidence 23.46%. Green grass (45.05%), VIP (37.7%), Peas meto (29.50%), Aleena (30.63%) and Azad (36.00%) were moderately susceptible. The Varieties PF-450 (65.00%), and Sprinter (61.70%) showed susceptible response. The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew. The macronutrients proved to be the highly effective with lowest disease incidence as 8.14%. Salicylic acid was the most effective plant activator followed by K2HPO4 that exhibited the minimum diseases incidence 16.38% and 22.62% respectively. Our findings concluded that the variety Peas-2009 was highly resistant against the powdery mildew. Macronutrients and salicylic acid (SA) were highly potent nutrient and plant activator in minimizing the development of this radical fungal pathogen.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
No. 267 was resistant to pea powdery mildew, with 3.3% incidence.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Material
- No. 267e0
- Interactor
- E. pisi
.jpg?width=60)
Erysiphe pisie0pathogen - Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Value
- 3.3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Varieties/lines including No. 267, F-16, and Peas-2009 exhibited a resistant response to E. pisi with a disease incidence of 3.3, 6.6, and 1.6% respectively.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
F-16 was resistant to pea powdery mildew, with 6.6% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- F-16e0
- Interactor
- E. pisiErysiphe pisie0pathogen
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Value
- 6.6e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Varieties/lines including No. 267, F-16, and Peas-2009 exhibited a resistant response to E. pisi with a disease incidence of 3.3, 6.6, and 1.6% respectively.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Peas-2009 was resistant to pea powdery mildew, with 1.6% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- Peas-2009e0
- Interactor
- E. pisiErysiphe pisie0pathogen
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Value
- 1.6%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Varieties/lines including No. 267, F-16, and Peas-2009 exhibited a resistant response to E. pisi with a disease incidence of 3.3, 6.6, and 1.6% respectively.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The winner was moderately resistant to pea powdery mildew, with 23.46% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- The winnere0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Value
- 23.46%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The winner showed moderately resistant response with disease incidence 23.46%.”
t0“pea”
e1“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
Claim · model-written summary
Green grass was moderately susceptible to pea powdery mildew, with 45.05% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- Green grasse0
- Outcome
- powdery mildewe1
- Value
- 45.05%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Green grass (45.05%), VIP (37.7%), Peas meto (29.50%), Aleena (30.63%) and Azad (36.00%) were moderately susceptible.”
t0“pea”
e1“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
Claim · model-written summary
VIP was moderately susceptible to pea powdery mildew, with 37.7% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- VIPe0
- Outcome
- powdery mildewe1
- Value
- 37.7%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Green grass (45.05%), VIP (37.7%), Peas meto (29.50%), Aleena (30.63%) and Azad (36.00%) were moderately susceptible.”
t0“pea”
e1“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
Claim · model-written summary
Peas meto was moderately susceptible to pea powdery mildew, with 29.50% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- Peas metoe0
- Outcome
- powdery mildewe1
- Value
- 29.50%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Green grass (45.05%), VIP (37.7%), Peas meto (29.50%), Aleena (30.63%) and Azad (36.00%) were moderately susceptible.”
t0“pea”
e1“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
Claim · model-written summary
Aleena was moderately susceptible to pea powdery mildew, with 30.63% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- Aleenae0
- Outcome
- powdery mildewe1
- Value
- 30.63%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Green grass (45.05%), VIP (37.7%), Peas meto (29.50%), Aleena (30.63%) and Azad (36.00%) were moderately susceptible.”
t0“pea”
e1“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
Claim · model-written summary
Azad was moderately susceptible to pea powdery mildew, with 36.00% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- Azade0
- Outcome
- powdery mildewe1
- Value
- 36.00%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Green grass (45.05%), VIP (37.7%), Peas meto (29.50%), Aleena (30.63%) and Azad (36.00%) were moderately susceptible.”
t0“pea”
e1“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
Claim · model-written summary
PF-450 was susceptible to pea powdery mildew, with 65.00% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- PF-450e0
- Outcome
- powdery mildewe1
- Value
- 65.00%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Varieties PF-450 (65.00%), and Sprinter (61.70%) showed susceptible response.”
t0“pea”
e1“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprinter was susceptible to pea powdery mildew, with 61.70% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- Sprintere0
- Outcome
- powdery mildewe1
- Value
- 61.70%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Varieties PF-450 (65.00%), and Sprinter (61.70%) showed susceptible response.”
t0“pea”
e1“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
Claim · model-written summary
Climax was highly susceptible to pea powdery mildew, with 74.00% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- Climaxe0
- Interactor
- powdery mildewe0pathogen
- Outcome
- powdery mildewe0
- Value
- 74.00%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Meteor was highly susceptible to pea powdery mildew, with 73.53% incidence.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Material
- Meteore0
- Interactor
- powdery mildewe0pathogen
- Outcome
- powdery mildewe0
- Value
- 73.53%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Varieties Climax (74.00%) and Meteor (73.53%) were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
macronutrients minimized pea powdery mildew incidence to 8.14%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- macronutrientse0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 8.14%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The macronutrients proved to be the highly effective with lowest disease incidence as 8.14%.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid minimized pea powdery mildew incidence to 16.38%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Salicylic acide0
- Outcome
- diseases incidencee0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 16.38%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Salicylic acid was the most effective plant activator followed by K2HPO4 that exhibited the minimum diseases incidence 16.38% and 22.62% respectively.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
K2HPO4 minimized pea powdery mildew incidence to 22.62%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- K2HPO4e0
- Outcome
- diseases incidencee0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 22.62%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Salicylic acid was the most effective plant activator followed by K2HPO4 that exhibited the minimum diseases incidence 16.38% and 22.62% respectively.”
t0“pea”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.