Paper · 2020 · Annals of Applied Biology

Nitrogen fertiliser and establishment method affect growth, yield and nitrogen use efficiency of rice under alternate wetting and drying irrigation

Raquel Santiago‐Arenas; Buyung A. Fanshuri; Sholih N. Hadi; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Sustainable rice production through selection of best suitable cultivar, water‐efficient crop establishment method and optimum nitrogen (N) management practice is needed to feed the growing world population. Two polyhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the response of rice to different rates and schedules of N application under different establishment methods subjected to alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation. In the first experiment, the response of two rice cultivars (Pathumthani 1, RD57) under three establishment methods (transplanting [TP], wet direct seeding [WDS], dry direct seeding [DDS]) and five N rates (0 [N 0 ], 30 [N 30 ], 60 [N 60 ], 90 [N 90 ], 120 [N 120 ] kg ha −1 ) was evaluated. The second experiment consisted of the same cultivars and establishment methods, but with four N application schedules (T 1 : 100% at basal; T 2 : 75% + 25% at basal and at active tillering, respectively; T 3 : 50% + 25% + 25% at basal, at active tillering and at panicle initiation, respectively; and T 4 : 25% + 25% + 25% + 25% each at basal, at active tillering, at panicle initiation and at early flowering or just before heading starts) applied at the rate of N 60 kg ha −1 . Plants were maintained under AWD irrigation (soil was saturated by applying water whenever soil water potential drops to −5 kPa during the implementation period) in both experiments. RD57 performed better than Pathumthani 1 having higher shoot dry matter, panicle number, grain yield, total N uptake and apparent N recovery efficiency. TP gave better response than WDS and DDS regardless of cultivars. Application of N 120 resulted in better growth, yield and its components and total N uptake regardless of establishment methods and cultivars. Increasing N rate decreased N use efficiency (NUE). Scheduling the interval of N application to two or three times (T 2 or T 3 ) for RD57 and Pathumthani 1, respectively, provided overall better results, and could be recommended for the tested rice cultivars. An optimal N rate and selection of critical growth stages for N application would be very effective for maximising yield and NUE under the water‐saving cultivation technique of AWD irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RD57 exceeded Pathumthani 1 in shoot dry matter, panicle number, and grain yield.

Material
RD57e1
Outcome
shoot dry matter, panicle number, grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Pathumthani 1e1

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice cultivars (Pathumthani 1, RD57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–520 · show in text ↑
e1

“RD57 performed better than Pathumthani 1 having higher shoot dry matter, panicle number, grain yield, total N uptake and apparent N recovery efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RD57 exceeded Pathumthani 1 in total N uptake and apparent N recovery efficiency.

Material
RD57e1
Outcome
total N uptake and apparent N recovery efficiencye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Pathumthani 1e1

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice cultivars (Pathumthani 1, RD57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–520 · show in text ↑
e1

“RD57 performed better than Pathumthani 1 having higher shoot dry matter, panicle number, grain yield, total N uptake and apparent N recovery efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting performed better than wet and dry direct seeding.

Treatment
TPe1
Outcome
better responsee1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
WDS and DDSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of rice to different rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“TP gave better response than WDS and DDS regardless of cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1612 · show in text ↑
e2

“transplanting [TP], wet direct seeding [WDS], dry direct seeding [DDS]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 120 gave better growth, yield, yield components, and total N uptake.

Treatment
N 120e1
Outcome
growth, yield and its componentse1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
regardless of establishment methods and cultivarse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of rice to different rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of N 120 resulted in better growth, yield and its components and total N uptake regardless of establishment methods and cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1755 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rate decreased N use efficiency.

Treatment
N ratee1
Outcome
N use efficiency (NUE)e1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of rice to different rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing N rate decreased N use efficiency (NUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two N applications gave overall better results for RD57.

Material
RD57e1
Treatment
T 2e1
Outcome
overall better resultse1
Direction
bettere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of rice to different rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“Scheduling the interval of N application to two or three times (T 2 or T 3 ) for RD57 and Pathumthani 1, respectively, provided overall better results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three N applications gave overall better results for Pathumthani 1.

Material
Pathumthani 1e1
Treatment
T 3e1
Outcome
overall better resultse1
Direction
bettere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of rice to different rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“Scheduling the interval of N application to two or three times (T 2 or T 3 ) for RD57 and Pathumthani 1, respectively, provided overall better results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1959 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the two-application schedule for RD57.

Material
RD57e1
Outcome
T 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of rice to different rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“T 2 or T 3 ) for RD57 and Pathumthani 1, respectively, provided overall better results, and could be recommended for the tested rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–2015 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the three-application schedule for Pathumthani 1.

Material
Pathumthani 1e1
Outcome
T 3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of rice to different rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“T 2 or T 3 ) for RD57 and Pathumthani 1, respectively, provided overall better results, and could be recommended for the tested rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–2015 · show in text ↑