Paper · 2020 · Pathogens

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Two Cucumber Cultivars with Different Sensitivity to Cucumber Mosaic Virus Infection

Zdeno Šubr; Lukáš Predajňa; Katarína Šoltys; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), with extremely broad host range including both monocots and dicots around the world, belongs to most important viral crop threats. Either natural or genetically constructed sources of resistance are being intensively investigated; for this purpose, exhaustive knowledge of molecular virus-host interaction during compatible and incompatible infection is required. New technologies and computer-based "omics" on various levels contribute markedly to this topic. In this work, two cucumber cultivars with different response to CMV challenge were tested, i.e., sensitive cv. Vanda and resistant cv. Heliana. The transcriptomes were prepared from both cultivars at 18 days after CMV or mock inoculation. Subsequently, four independent comparative analyses of obtained data were performed, viz. mock- and CMV-inoculated samples within each cultivar, samples from mock-inoculated cultivars to each other and samples from virus-inoculated cultivars to each other. A detailed picture of CMV-influenced genes, as well as constitutive differences in cultivar-specific gene expression was obtained. The compatible CMV infection of cv. Vanda caused downregulation of genes involved in photosynthesis, and induction of genes connected with protein production and modification, as well as components of signaling pathways. CMV challenge caused practically no change in the transcription profile of the cv. Heliana. The main differences between constitutive transcription activity of the two cultivars relied in the expression of genes responsible for methylation, phosphorylation, cell wall organization and carbohydrate metabolism (prevailing in cv. Heliana), or chromosome condensation and glucan biosynthesis (prevailing in cv. Vanda). Involvement of several genes in the resistant cucumber phenotype was predicted; this can be after biological confirmation potentially applied in breeding programs for virus-resistant crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compatible CMV infection downregulated photosynthesis genes in cucumber cv. Vanda relative to mock inoculation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
cv. Vandae3
Treatment
compatible CMV infectione3
Interactor
Cucumber mosaic viruscucumber mosaic cucumoviruse1pathogen
Outcome
genes involved in photosynthesise3
Direction
downregulatione3
Comparator
mock inoculatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · InteractorDieterO · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cucumber cultivars with different response to CMV challenge were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), with extremely broad host range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e2

“The transcriptomes were prepared from both cultivars at 18 days after CMV or mock inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–727 · show in text ↑
e3

“The compatible CMV infection of cv. Vanda caused downregulation of genes involved in photosynthesis, and induction of genes connected with protein production and modification, as well as components of signaling pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compatible CMV infection induced genes for protein production and modification and components of signaling pathways in cucumber cv. Vanda.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
cv. Vandae3
Treatment
compatible CMV infectione3
Interactor
Cucumber mosaic viruscucumber mosaic cucumoviruse1pathogen
Outcome
genes connected with protein production and modification, as well as components of signaling pathwayse3
Direction
inductione3
Comparator
mock inoculatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · InteractorDieterO · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cucumber cultivars with different response to CMV challenge were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), with extremely broad host range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e2

“The transcriptomes were prepared from both cultivars at 18 days after CMV or mock inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–727 · show in text ↑
e3

“The compatible CMV infection of cv. Vanda caused downregulation of genes involved in photosynthesis, and induction of genes connected with protein production and modification, as well as components of signaling pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMV challenge caused practically no change in the transcription profile of cucumber cv. Heliana.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
cv. Helianae4
Treatment
CMV challengee4
Interactor
Cucumber mosaic viruscucumber mosaic cucumoviruse1pathogen
Outcome
transcription profilee4
Direction
no changee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · InteractorDieterO · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cucumber cultivars with different response to CMV challenge were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), with extremely broad host range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e4

“CMV challenge caused practically no change in the transcription profile of the cv. Heliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1428 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genes for methylation, phosphorylation, cell wall organization and carbohydrate metabolism were expressed more in cv. Heliana than cv. Vanda.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
cv. Helianae5
Outcome
expression of genes responsible for methylation, phosphorylation, cell wall organization and carbohydrate metabolisme5
Direction
prevailinge5
Comparator
cv. Vandae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cucumber cultivars with different response to CMV challenge were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–579 · show in text ↑
e5

“The main differences between constitutive transcription activity of the two cultivars relied in the expression of genes responsible for methylation, phosphorylation, cell wall organization and carbohydrate metabolism (prevailing in cv. Heliana), or chromosome condensation and glucan biosynthesis (prevailing in cv. Vanda)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1752 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromosome condensation and glucan biosynthesis genes were expressed more in cv. Vanda than cv. Heliana.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
cv. Vandae5
Outcome
chromosome condensation and glucan biosynthesise5
Direction
prevailinge5
Comparator
cv. Helianae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cucumber cultivars with different response to CMV challenge were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–579 · show in text ↑
e5

“The main differences between constitutive transcription activity of the two cultivars relied in the expression of genes responsible for methylation, phosphorylation, cell wall organization and carbohydrate metabolism (prevailing in cv. Heliana), or chromosome condensation and glucan biosynthesis (prevailing in cv. Vanda)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1752 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several genes are predicted to be involved in the resistant cucumber phenotype.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
resistant cucumber phenotypee6
Qualifier
Involvement of several genese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cucumber cultivars with different response to CMV challenge were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–579 · show in text ↑
e6

“Involvement of several genes in the resistant cucumber phenotype was predicted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1832 · show in text ↑

infection · cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.