Paper · 2016 · PubMed

[Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica.]

Ke Peng Wang; Bo Dong; Yan Wu Wang; et al.

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To find effective ways for protecting and recovering an endangered species Rhodiola gannanica in Gannan, an important distribution region of this species in the eastern Tibetan Plateau of China, the breeding system, reproductive process, flowering phenological characteristics and other reproductive controlling factors were investigated. The results showed that there was a unique breeding system in R. gannanica, which was dioecious, and male flowers were also bisexual plants in the early stage of flower bud differentiation. While the sac of pistil was aborted in a certain stage with the development of flowers, the bisexual plants only played the role of males' functions. The outcrossing reproduction was observed, the pollination mode was mainly by wind, and the population flowering occurred in the season with abundant precipitation and high temperature. The bud satge appeared in early June, the florescence was in mid-June, and the flourishing florescence was in early July. The flo-wering duration of R. fastigiata was about 36 d, and the fruit ripening began in late August. The flo-wering time and the flowering duration of the bisexual plants were earlier than female plants. Due to the low pollination rate of the female plants, the buds and ovules were damaged and the 1-3 years young plants barely got flowering and fruiting, the rate of flowering and fruiting of the community only reached 11.0% and the rate of seed natural propagation was low (about 2.0%). 20.0%-25.1% buds of female plants were damaged from bud to flowering stages. 51.1%-65.0% flowers were aborted from flowering to fruiting stages. Only 10.1%-21.0% of ovules developed into seeds. The seed production of per female plant was 158.1, seed germination rate was 81.5% under artificial conditions, and seedling survival rate reached 36.0% in the first year. Our results revealed that seed quality was not the key ecological factor, while it was the pollen limitation, low seed production and the survival rate of seedling that resulted in the reproductive success and species endangered situation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhodiola gannanica has a dioecious breeding system.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
breeding systeme1
Qualifier
dioeciouse1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was a unique breeding system in R. gannanica, which was dioecious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–434 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Outcrossing reproduction was observed in Rhodiola gannanica, with pollination mainly by wind.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
outcrossing reproductione2
Qualifier
mainly by winde2

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“The outcrossing reproduction was observed, the pollination mode was mainly by wind”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population flowering occurred in the season with abundant precipitation and high temperature.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
population floweringe3
Qualifier
season with abundant precipitation and high temperaturee3

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“the population flowering occurred in the season with abundant precipitation and high temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buds of Rhodiola gannanica appeared in early June.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Organ / stage
bude4
Outcome
appearede4
Value
early Junee4

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“The bud satge appeared in early June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–901 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Florescence of Rhodiola gannanica was in mid-June.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
florescencee5
Value
mid-Junee5

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e5

“the florescence was in mid-June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–934 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The flourishing florescence of Rhodiola gannanica was in early July.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
flourishing florescencee6
Value
early Julye6

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e6

“the flourishing florescence was in early July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–985 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The flowering duration of R. fastigiata was about 36 days.

Taxon
R. fastigiataRhodiola fastigiatae7
Outcome
flo-wering duratione7
Value
36 de7

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“The flo-wering duration of R. fastigiata was about 36 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit ripening of Rhodiola gannanica began in late August.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
fruit ripeninge1
Value
late Auguste1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fruit ripening began in late August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1087 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bisexual plants flowered earlier than female plants.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Material
bisexual plantse1
Outcome
flo-wering timee1
Direction
earliere1
Comparator
female plantse1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“The flo-wering time and the flowering duration of the bisexual plants were earlier than female plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1190 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of flowering and fruiting of the community reached only 11.0%.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
rate of flowering and fruiting of the communitye1
Value
11.0%e1
Qualifier
only reachede1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rate of flowering and fruiting of the community only reached 11.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1415 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1-3 year old plants barely flowered and fruited.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Organ / stage
1-3 years young plantse1
Outcome
got flowering and fruitinge1
Qualifier
barelye1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“the 1-3 years young plants barely got flowering and fruiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1343 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20.0%-25.1% of buds of female plants were damaged from bud to flowering stages.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Material
female plantse1
Organ / stage
budse1
Outcome
were damagede1
Value
20.0%-25.1%e1
Qualifier
from bud to flowering stagese1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“20.0%-25.1% buds of female plants were damaged from bud to flowering stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1554 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

51.1%-65.0% of flowers were aborted from flowering to fruiting stages.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Organ / stage
flowerse1
Outcome
were abortede1
Value
51.1%-65.0%e1
Qualifier
from flowering to fruiting stagese1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“51.1%-65.0% flowers were aborted from flowering to fruiting stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1622 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 10.1%-21.0% of ovules developed into seeds.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Organ / stage
ovulese1
Outcome
developed into seedse1
Value
10.1%-21.0%e1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Only 10.1%-21.0% of ovules developed into seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1671 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed production per female plant was 158.1.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Material
female plante1
Outcome
seed productione1
Value
158.1e1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“The seed production of per female plant was 158.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1722 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination rate was 81.5% under artificial conditions.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
seed germination ratee1
Value
81.5%e1
Setting
artificial conditionse1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed germination rate was 81.5% under artificial conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1783 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling survival rate reached 36.0% in the first year.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Organ / stage
seedlinge1
Outcome
seedling survival ratee1
Value
36.0%e1
Qualifier
in the first yeare1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedling survival rate reached 36.0% in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1843 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed quality was not the key ecological factor for reproductive success of Rhodiola gannanica.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
seed qualitye1
Qualifier
not the key ecological factore1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed quality was not the key ecological factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–1917 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen limitation, low seed production and low seedling survival resulted in the reproductive success and endangered status of Rhodiola gannanica.

Taxon
Rhodiola gannanicaRhodiola gannanicat0
Outcome
reproductive successe1
Qualifier
pollen limitation, low seed production and the survival rate of seedlinge1

Verbatim

t0

“Analysis of reproductive ecological factors of endangered Rhodiola gannanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 1–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“while it was the pollen limitation, low seed production and the survival rate of seedling that resulted in the reproductive success and species endangered situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2083 · show in text ↑