Paper · 2020 · Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences

Co-Operation Impact Between Gamma Radiation and Spraying Droplets Distribution for Bioinsecticides Controlling Boll Pests on Cotton Plants in Egypt

Reda Amer; Rehab, Dar; M. Salem; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out of about 8 karats planted with (Giza 86) cotton variety during seasons 2018 and 2019 on 21st July and 5th, 20th August in a field located at Qaha Research Station, Plant Protection Research Institute, Qalyoubia governorate. The selected area was split into 7 plots and the control plot. Two spraying machines were used Pneumatic motor sprayer (Cifarilli) (20 L./Fed.) and Hand-held Hydraulic sprayer (Matabi) (56 L./fed.) for application enhancement. Seven compounds related to different insecticide groups were used; one of them (B. thuringiensis)was exposed to gamma radiation doses of 160, 320 & 640 Gy (gray) =for potentiating purpose. The treatments were Bacillus thuringiensis (Kurstaki), B. thuringiensis +160 Gy, B. thuringiensis +320 Gy, B. thuringiensis +640 Gy, azadirachtin, B. thuringiensis +azadirachtin and diflubenzuron. The treatments mentioned were evaluated against three pests of cotton bolls that were pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund); spiny bollworm, Earias insulana (Boisd.) and Cottonseed bug, Oxycarenus hyalinipennis (Costa) population and infestation reduction percentages. B. thuringiensis +640 Gy and diflubenzuron were considered the best treatments that caused reduction percentages in population and infestations against three pests used, followed by B. thuringiensis +320 Gy, B. thuringiensis +160 Gy and B. thuringiensis + azadirachtin, azadirachtin and then B. thuringiensis. In addition, the compounds used to enhance the most cotton crop parameters acts in seed numbers, lint and seed weights during the two cotton seasons 2018 & 2019. So, gamma radiation (160, 320 & 640 Gy) could potentiate B. thuringiensis to become the most effective compound on mentioned three pests and cotton crop parameters compared with the same compounds without exposing to gamma radiation; also, knapsack motor sprayer contribute to success the pest control comparing with Hand-held Hydraulic sprayer (Matabi) (56 L./fed.) that was the least efficient according to homogeneity of droplet spectrum. It could be recommended to use these Bio-Insecticides with Low Volume spraying equipment with not less than (20 L/Fed.). A satisfactory coverage was obtained on cotton plants. The spectrum of droplets ranging between 122-185 mm (VMD). With a sufficient number ranging from 33-253 N/cm². The rate of performance of Pneumatic motor sprayer (Cifarilli) (20 L./Fed.) was 12 Fed./day. It was the best equipment, but the lowest rate of performance was Hand-held Hydraulic sprayer (Matabi) (56 L./fed.) since it could spray only 3.45 Fed./day. Data showed that bio-insecticides may be recommended in integrated pest management because of their safety on animals, man and environment. Also, Low Volume spraying reducing the time lost in the process filling the machines with the spray solution and saving the lost spray on the ground.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis +640 Gy and diflubenzuron gave the best reductions in cotton boll pest populations and infestations.

Taxon
Cotton PlantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
B. thuringiensis +640 Gy and diflubenzurone0
Outcome
reduction percentages in population and infestations against three pestse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. thuringiensis +640 Gy and diflubenzuron were considered the best treatments that caused reduction percentages in population and infestations against three pests used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The compounds enhanced cotton seed number and lint and seed weights.

Taxon
Cotton PlantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
compoundse0
Outcome
seed numbers, lint and seed weightse0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the compounds used to enhance the most cotton crop parameters acts in seed numbers, lint and seed weights during the two cotton seasons 2018 & 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma radiation potentiated B. thuringiensis against the three cotton pests relative to unirradiated compounds.

Taxon
Cotton PlantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
gamma radiation (160, 320 & 640 Gy)e0
Outcome
most effective compound on mentioned three pestse0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
same compounds without exposing to gamma radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gamma radiation (160, 320 & 640 Gy) could potentiate B. thuringiensis to become the most effective compound on mentioned three pests and cotton crop parameters compared with the same compounds without exposing to gamma radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The knapsack motor sprayer improved pest control relative to the hand-held hydraulic sprayer.

Taxon
Cotton PlantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
knapsack motor sprayere0
Outcome
pest controle0
Direction
successe0
Comparator
Hand-held Hydraulic sprayer (Matabi) (56 L./fed.)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“knapsack motor sprayer contribute to success the pest control comparing with Hand-held Hydraulic sprayer (Matabi) (56 L./fed.) that was the least efficient according to homogeneity of droplet spectrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pneumatic motor sprayer performance was 12 Fed./day.

Taxon
Cotton PlantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Pneumatic motor sprayer (Cifarilli) (20 L./Fed.)e0
Outcome
rate of performancee0
Value
12 Fed./daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of performance of Pneumatic motor sprayer (Cifarilli) (20 L./Fed.) was 12 Fed./day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2352–2444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hand-held hydraulic sprayer performance was 3.45 Fed./day.

Taxon
Cotton PlantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Hand-held Hydraulic sprayer (Matabi) (56 L./fed.)e0
Outcome
spraye0
Value
3.45 Fed./daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand-held Hydraulic sprayer (Matabi) (56 L./fed.) since it could spray only 3.45 Fed./day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2511–2600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–138 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend bio-insecticides with low volume spraying equipment at no less than 20 L/Fed.

Taxon
Cotton PlantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
use these Bio-Insecticides with Low Volume spraying equipment with not less than (20 L/Fed.)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It could be recommended to use these Bio-Insecticides with Low Volume spraying equipment with not less than (20 L/Fed.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2065–2185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–138 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

radiation · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.