Paper · 1982 · Annals of Applied Biology

Fungicidal control of Rhizoctonia solani in soil amended with organic manures

R. BANDYOPADHYAY; J. P. S. YADAV; H. R. KATARIA; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Amendments of nutrient‐deficient soil with three organic manures and one non‐edible oil‐cake reduced the disease controlling potential of methoxyethyl mercury chloride (MEMC), quintozene and carbendazim used as seed treatments on cowpea and cotton against seedling rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani . Biogas sludge (BGS) and farm yard manure (FYM) nullified the activity of MEMC and quintozene and reduced markedly the efficacy of carbendazim. Humic acid extracted from BGS inactivated MEMC and carbendazim but had little effect on quintozene. Green manure ( Sesbania aculeata ) slightly reduced the efficacy of MEMC only. Soil amendment with mahua ( Madhuca indica ) cake and soil drench with its aqueous extract greatly reduced the efficacy of the three fungicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures and oil-cake reduced fungicide control of seedling rot.

Treatment
three organic manures and one non‐edible oil‐cakee0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
disease controlling potentiale0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendments of nutrient‐deficient soil with three organic manures and one non‐edible oil‐cake reduced the disease controlling potential of methoxyethyl mercury chloride (MEMC), quintozene and carbendazim used as seed treatments on cowpea and cotton against seedling rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas sludge and farm yard manure nullified MEMC and quintozene activity.

Treatment
Biogas sludge (BGS) and farm yard manure (FYM)e0
Outcome
activity of MEMC and quintozenee0
Direction
nullifiede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biogas sludge (BGS) and farm yard manure (FYM) nullified the activity of MEMC and quintozene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas sludge and farm yard manure markedly reduced carbendazim efficacy.

Treatment
Biogas sludge (BGS) and farm yard manure (FYM)e0
Outcome
efficacy of carbendazime0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biogas sludge (BGS) and farm yard manure (FYM) nullified the activity of MEMC and quintozene and reduced markedly the efficacy of carbendazim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–449 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid from BGS inactivated MEMC and carbendazim.

Treatment
Humic acid extracted from BGSe0
Outcome
MEMC and carbendazime0
Direction
inactivatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acid extracted from BGS inactivated MEMC and carbendazim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid from BGS had little effect on quintozene.

Treatment
Humic acid extracted from BGSe0
Outcome
quintozenee0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acid extracted from BGS inactivated MEMC and carbendazim but had little effect on quintozene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania green manure slightly reduced MEMC efficacy.

Treatment
Green manure ( Sesbania aculeata )e0
Outcome
efficacy of MEMCe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure ( Sesbania aculeata ) slightly reduced the efficacy of MEMC only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mahua cake and its aqueous extract greatly reduced efficacy of three fungicides.

Treatment
mahua ( Madhuca indica ) cake and soil drench with its aqueous extracte0
Outcome
efficacy of the three fungicidese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil amendment with mahua ( Madhuca indica ) cake and soil drench with its aqueous extract greatly reduced the efficacy of the three fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–255 · show in text ↑

organic · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · Rhizoctonia solani · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · Rhizoctonia solani · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

botanical · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · control · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · Rhizoctonia solani · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.