Paper · 2015 · ˜The œjournal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science

Salinity Responses of Selected Introgressed Cotton Lines Grown in Two Soils from Organic and Conventional Cotton Production

Brian Barrick; Robert Steiner; Geno Picchioni; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity. Genetic variation in salt tolerance is often evaluated in potting soil media irrigated with saline solutions but not a field soil. This study evaluated the efficacy of screening four introgressed Upland genotypes from a backcross Gossypium hirsutum L. × G. barbadense L. inbred line population grown in two soils, i.e., an organic farm loam soil or a conventional farm clay soil. The genotypes were treated with NaCl for three wk at concentrations of 0 or 200 mM starting at the second true leaf stage. Chlorophyll content and fluorescence, plant height, leaf length, main stem node number and internode length, shoot biomass, and number of fruiting sites at three, six and nine week intervals (WT) were measured. Significant genotypic variation at three and six WT was observed, suggesting that salt tolerance screening in early cotton establishment is optimal. The salt treatment had negative effects on all growth traits except chlorophyll content and fluorescence. The organic farm loam soil amended with dairy manure had higher pre-treatment salinity content than the conventional farm clay, resulting in greater initial growth suppression at zero WT. However, the manure-amended soil showed less reduction in vegetative and reproductive growth after more prolonged salt treatment, suggesting that more scrutiny may be needed in soils treated with carbon-based fertilizers. The lack of genotype by soil or treatment interactions suggests that soil type had little bearing in screening cotton genotypes for salt tolerance and that control (non-saline) treatments may not be needed for cotton salt tolerance screening. Finally, this pot study demonstrates that three to six weeks of salt treatments after the second true leaf stage is an adequate duration of time to screen for cotton salt tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton genotypes showed significant genetic variation in salt response at three and six weeks.

Outcome
genotypic variatione1
Qualifier
at three and six WTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant genotypic variation at three and six WT was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–853 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Salt tolerance screening in early cotton establishment is optimal.

Outcome
salt tolerance screening in early cotton establishmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“suggesting that salt tolerance screening in early cotton establishment is optimal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt treatment had negative effects on growth traits of cotton.

Treatment
salt treatmente3
Outcome
growth traitse3
Direction
negative effectse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“The salt treatment had negative effects on all growth traits except chlorophyll content and fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt treatment did not reduce chlorophyll content and fluorescence in cotton.

Treatment
salt treatmente3
Outcome
chlorophyll content and fluorescencee3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“The salt treatment had negative effects on all growth traits except chlorophyll content and fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1042 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic loam soil amended with dairy manure had higher pre-treatment salinity content than conventional clay soil.

Treatment
dairy manuree4
Outcome
pre-treatment salinity contente4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
conventional farm claye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“The organic farm loam soil amended with dairy manure had higher pre-treatment salinity content than the conventional farm clay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure-amended soil caused greater initial growth suppression of cotton at zero weeks than conventional clay soil.

Treatment
dairy manuree4
Outcome
initial growth suppression at zero WTe5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
conventional farm claye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“The organic farm loam soil amended with dairy manure had higher pre-treatment salinity content than the conventional farm clay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1170 · show in text ↑
e5

“resulting in greater initial growth suppression at zero WT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure-amended soil showed less reduction in vegetative and reproductive growth of cotton after prolonged salt treatment than conventional clay soil.

Treatment
manure-amended soile6
Outcome
vegetative and reproductive growthe6
Direction
less reductione6
Qualifier
after more prolonged salt treatmente6
Comparator
conventional farm claye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“The organic farm loam soil amended with dairy manure had higher pre-treatment salinity content than the conventional farm clay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1170 · show in text ↑
e6

“the manure-amended soil showed less reduction in vegetative and reproductive growth after more prolonged salt treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by soil or treatment interactions were absent in cotton salt screening.

Outcome
genotype by soil or treatment interactionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e7

“The lack of genotype by soil or treatment interactions suggests that soil type had little bearing in screening cotton genotypes for salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1600 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Control (non-saline) treatments may not be needed for cotton salt tolerance screening.

Outcome
control (non-saline) treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (non-saline) treatments may not be needed for cotton salt tolerance screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1695 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type had little bearing on screening cotton genotypes for salt tolerance.

Outcome
little bearing in screening cotton genotypes for salt tolerancee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The lack of genotype by soil or treatment interactions suggests that soil type had little bearing in screening cotton genotypes for salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1600 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Three to six weeks of salt treatment after the second true leaf stage is an adequate duration to screen cotton for salt tolerance.

Treatment
three to six weeks of salt treatments after the second true leaf stagee0
Outcome
adequate duration of time to screen for cotton salt tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three to six weeks of salt treatments after the second true leaf stage is an adequate duration of time to screen for cotton salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1877 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

16 papers: 1 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

salinity · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 16 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.