Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Manure-amended soil showed less reduction in vegetative and reproductive growth of cotton after prolonged salt treatment than conventional clay soil.

A claim from Salinity Responses of Selected Introgressed Cotton Lines Grown in Two Soils from Organic and Conventional Cotton Production · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure-amended soil showed less reduction in vegetative and reproductive growth of cotton after prolonged salt treatment than conventional clay soil.

Treatment
manure-amended soile6
Outcome
vegetative and reproductive growthe6
Direction
less reductione6
Qualifier
after more prolonged salt treatmente6
Comparator
conventional farm claye4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73
e4

“The organic farm loam soil amended with dairy manure had higher pre-treatment salinity content than the conventional farm clay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1170
e6

“the manure-amended soil showed less reduction in vegetative and reproductive growth after more prolonged salt treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1360

Title

Salinity Responses of Selected Introgressed Cotton Lines Grown in Two Soils from Organic and Conventional Cotton Production

Brian Barrick; Robert Steiner; Geno Picchioni; et al. ˜The œjournal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science 2015. doi:10.56454/ugih4461

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e47e7cd881544ba3bdeb8d99c0277d011cfab4c14a453c21594ee9465b58e257 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

193 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.