Claim · model-written summary
Salt treatment had negative effects on growth traits of cotton.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- salt treatmente3
- Outcome
- growth traitse3
- Direction
- negative effectse3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cotton yield is adversely affected by various stresses including salinity”
e3“The salt treatment had negative effects on all growth traits except chlorophyll content and fluorescence”
Title
Brian Barrick; Robert Steiner; Geno Picchioni; et al. The journal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science 2015. doi:10.56454/ugih4461
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Cotton genotypes showed significant genetic variation in salt response at three and six weeks.
- Recommendation Salt tolerance screening in early cotton establishment is optimal.
- Intervention effect Salt treatment did not reduce chlorophyll content and fluorescence in cotton.
- Association Organic loam soil amended with dairy manure had higher pre-treatment salinity content than conventional clay soil.
- Intervention effect Manure-amended soil caused greater initial growth suppression of cotton at zero weeks than conventional clay soil.
- Intervention effect Manure-amended soil showed less reduction in vegetative and reproductive growth of cotton after prolonged salt treatment than conventional clay soil.
- Observation Genotype by soil or treatment interactions were absent in cotton salt screening.
- Recommendation Control (non-saline) treatments may not be needed for cotton salt tolerance screening.
- Observation Soil type had little bearing on screening cotton genotypes for salt tolerance.
- Recommendation Three to six weeks of salt treatment after the second true leaf stage is an adequate duration to screen cotton for salt tolerance.