Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at 3 g L −1 significantly enhanced cotton growth measures.

A claim from Optimizing irrigation salinity for cotton production through cotton yield and fiber quality and water use efficiency in arid regions · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 3 g L −1 significantly enhanced cotton growth measures.

Treatment
3 g L −1 salinity irrigatione0
Outcome
plant height (Ph), stem diameter (Sd), leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3 g L −1 salinity irrigation significantly enhanced growth parameters, including plant height (Ph), stem diameter (Sd), leaf area index (LAI), aboveground dry matter accumulation (Ab)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1087
t0

“cotton production through cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–73

Title

Optimizing irrigation salinity for cotton production through cotton yield and fiber quality and water use efficiency in arid regions

Wenhao Li; Cunhong Zhang; Minzhong Zou; et al. Industrial Crops and Products 2025. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121375

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a5109e8a7e417c4c50ec0bd5e2a10554b8e4c04240e7a7b48030a06703c68139 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

salinity · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 16 positive, 92 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 91 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

irrigation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 101 positive, 43 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this claim · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

135 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.