Paper · 2014 · PLoS ONE

Morphological and Physiological Responses of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants to Salinity

Lei Zhang; Huijuan Ma; Tingting Chen; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
240
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinization usually plays a primary role in soil degradation, which consequently reduces agricultural productivity. In this study, the effects of salinity on growth parameters, ion, chlorophyll, and proline content, photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme activities, and lipid peroxidation of two cotton cultivars, [CCRI-79 (salt tolerant) and Simian 3 (salt sensitive)], were evaluated. Salinity was investigated at 0 mM, 80 mM, 160 mM, and 240 mM NaCl for 7 days. Salinity induced morphological and physiological changes, including a reduction in the dry weight of leaves and roots, root length, root volume, average root diameter, chlorophyll and proline contents, net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. In addition, salinity caused ion imbalance in plants as shown by higher Na+ and Cl- contents and lower K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrations. Ion imbalance was more pronounced in CCRI-79 than in Simian3. In the leaves and roots of the salt-tolerant cultivar CCRI-79, increasing levels of salinity increased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR), but reduced catalase (CAT) activity. The activities of SOD, CAT, APX, and GR in the leaves and roots of CCRI-79 were higher than those in Simian 3. CAT and APX showed the greatest H2O2 scavenging activity in both leaves and roots. Moreover, CAT and APX activities in conjunction with SOD seem to play an essential protective role in the scavenging process. These results indicate that CCRI-79 has a more effective protection mechanism and mitigated oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation by maintaining higher antioxidant activities than those in Simian 3. Overall, the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and Chl (a+b) contents, net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance, SOD, CAT, APX, and GR activities showed the most significant variation between the two cotton cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced cotton leaf and root dry weight and root size traits.

Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
dry weight of leaves and roots, root length, root volume, average root diametere0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity induced morphological and physiological changes, including a reduction in the dry weight of leaves and roots, root length, root volume, average root diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced chlorophyll and proline content.

Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
chlorophyll and proline contentse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity induced morphological and physiological changes, including a reduction in the dry weight of leaves and roots, root length, root volume, average root diameter, chlorophyll and proline contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance.

Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
net photosynthesis and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity induced morphological and physiological changes, including a reduction in the dry weight of leaves and roots, root length, root volume, average root diameter, chlorophyll and proline contents, net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased Na+ and Cl- content.

Treatment
Salinityt0
Outcome
Na+ and Cl- contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher Na+ and Cl- contents and lower K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants to Salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrations.

Treatment
Salinityt0
Outcome
K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher Na+ and Cl- contents and lower K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants to Salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ion imbalance was greater in CCRI-79 than in Simian3.

Material
CCRI-79e0
Outcome
Ion imbalancee0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
Simian3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ion imbalance was more pronounced in CCRI-79 than in Simian3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity raised SOD, APX, and GR activities in CCRI-79 leaves and roots.

Taxon
CCRI-79e0
Material
CCRI-79e0
Treatment
increasing levels of salinitye0
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the leaves and roots of the salt-tolerant cultivar CCRI-79, increasing levels of salinity increased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced CAT activity in CCRI-79.

Material
CCRI-79e1
Treatment
increasing levels of salinitye0
Outcome
catalase (CAT) activitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing levels of salinity increased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR), but reduced catalase (CAT) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the leaves and roots of the salt-tolerant cultivar CCRI-79”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD, CAT, APX, and GR activities were higher in CCRI-79 than Simian 3.

Material
CCRI-79e0
Outcome
activities of SOD, CAT, APX, and GRe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Simian 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of SOD, CAT, APX, and GR in the leaves and roots of CCRI-79 were higher than those in Simian 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT and APX had the greatest H2O2 scavenging activity in leaves and roots.

Gene
CAT and APXe0
Outcome
H2O2 scavenging activitye0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CAT and APX showed the greatest H2O2 scavenging activity in both leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–82 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer a protective role for CAT, APX, and SOD in scavenging.

Gene
CAT and APXe0
Outcome
scavenging processe0
Qualifier
in conjunction with SODe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CAT and APX activities in conjunction with SOD seem to play an essential protective role in the scavenging process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–82 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCRI-79 mitigated oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation through higher antioxidant activity.

Material
CCRI-79e0
Outcome
oxidative stress and lipid peroxidatione0
Qualifier
maintaining higher antioxidant activitiese0
Comparator
Simian 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CCRI-79 has a more effective protection mechanism and mitigated oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation by maintaining higher antioxidant activities than those in Simian 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–82 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

16 papers: 1 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

26 papers: 4 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

salinity · physiology: ion balance · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 2 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 16 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.