Paper · 2020 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Irrigation Module and Sowing Date Affect Seed Cotton Yield, Quality, Productivity Indices, and Economics of Cotton in North-western India

Kulvir Singh; Harinder Pal Singh; Sudhir Kumar Mishra

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Delayed sowing and imprecise application of irrigation water to cotton has been the major hurdle in sustaining cotton yield in north-western India. Therefore, studies were initiated to ascertain the impact of heavy or normal level of presowing irrigation (PSI), scheduling time of first postsowing irrigation (POSI) under two sowing dates (SDs) on cotton arranged in a split block design replicated thrice. PSIh (100 mm) recorded 23.2% higher seed cotton yield over PSIn (70 mm) owing to better yield attributes and higher stand. First POSI at 4 weeks after sowing (WAS) resulted the highest yield (3072 kg ha−1), while one at 6 WAS (POSI6) recorded least due to poor population and reduced yield attributes. Water productivity under POSI6 was lesser by 29.1%, 25.2%, and 16.2% as compared to POSI3, POSI4, and POSI5, respectively. April sown crop out yielded the May sown cotton crop by 939 kg ha−1 due to better yield attributes. Nitrogen factor productivity (NFP) among SD remained higher by 23.3% for April as compared to May sowing. PSIh exhibited better NFP over PSIn. POSI6 recorded least NFP by 24.4%, 28.5%, and 16.3% as compared to POSI3, POSI4, and POSI5, respectively and was indicative of relatively poor utilization of N under delayed schedules. Therefore, planting in April after heavy PSI and scheduling first POSI at 4 WAS is best strategy for sustaining cotton yield and maximizing farmer profitability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy presowing irrigation raised seed cotton yield by 23.2% over normal irrigation.

Treatment
PSIh (100 mm)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.2%e0
Comparator
PSIn (70 mm)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PSIh (100 mm) recorded 23.2% higher seed cotton yield over PSIn (70 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First postsowing irrigation at four weeks gave the highest yield, 3072 kg ha−1.

Treatment
First POSI at 4 weeks after sowing (WAS)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3072 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
one at 6 WAS (POSI6)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“First POSI at 4 weeks after sowing (WAS) resulted the highest yield (3072 kg ha−1), while one at 6 WAS (POSI6) recorded least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POSI6 water productivity was lower than POSI3 by 29.1%.

Treatment
POSI6e0
Outcome
Water productivitye0
Direction
lessere0
Value
29.1%e0
Comparator
POSI3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water productivity under POSI6 was lesser by 29.1%, 25.2%, and 16.2% as compared to POSI3, POSI4, and POSI5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POSI6 water productivity was lower than POSI4 by 25.2%.

Treatment
POSI6e0
Outcome
Water productivitye0
Direction
lessere0
Value
25.2%e0
Comparator
POSI4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water productivity under POSI6 was lesser by 29.1%, 25.2%, and 16.2% as compared to POSI3, POSI4, and POSI5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POSI6 water productivity was lower than POSI5 by 16.2%.

Treatment
POSI6e0
Outcome
Water productivitye0
Direction
lessere0
Value
16.2%e0
Comparator
POSI5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water productivity under POSI6 was lesser by 29.1%, 25.2%, and 16.2% as compared to POSI3, POSI4, and POSI5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

April sowing increased yield by 939 kg ha−1 relative to May sowing.

Treatment
April sowne0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
out yieldede0
Value
939 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
May sowne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“April sown crop out yielded the May sown cotton crop by 939 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

April sowing raised nitrogen factor productivity by 23.3% versus May sowing.

Treatment
Aprile0
Outcome
Nitrogen factor productivity (NFP)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.3%e0
Comparator
May sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen factor productivity (NFP) among SD remained higher by 23.3% for April as compared to May sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy presowing irrigation improved nitrogen factor productivity over normal irrigation.

Treatment
PSIhe0
Outcome
NFPe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
PSIne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PSIh exhibited better NFP over PSIn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POSI6 nitrogen factor productivity was lower than POSI3 by 24.4%.

Treatment
POSI6e0
Outcome
NFPe0
Direction
leaste0
Value
24.4%e0
Comparator
POSI3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POSI6 recorded least NFP by 24.4%, 28.5%, and 16.3% as compared to POSI3, POSI4, and POSI5, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POSI6 nitrogen factor productivity was lower than POSI4 by 28.5%.

Treatment
POSI6e0
Outcome
NFPe0
Direction
leaste0
Value
28.5%e0
Comparator
POSI4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POSI6 recorded least NFP by 24.4%, 28.5%, and 16.3% as compared to POSI3, POSI4, and POSI5, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POSI6 nitrogen factor productivity was lower than POSI5 by 16.3%.

Treatment
POSI6e0
Outcome
NFPe0
Direction
leaste0
Value
16.3%e0
Comparator
POSI5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POSI6 recorded least NFP by 24.4%, 28.5%, and 16.3% as compared to POSI3, POSI4, and POSI5, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton in North-western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend April planting after heavy presowing irrigation and first postsowing irrigation at four weeks.

Outcome
planting in April after heavy PSI and scheduling first POSI at 4 WASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting in April after heavy PSI and scheduling first POSI at 4 WAS is best strategy for sustaining cotton yield and maximizing farmer profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1421 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.