Abstract
Bio-efficacy of indoxacarb 14.5 SC (0.005 %), λ-cyhalothrin 5 EC (0.003 %), quinalphos 25 EC (0.05%), dimethoate 30 EC (0.03 %), spiromesifen 22.9 SC (0.028 %) and thiamethoxam 25 WG (0.008 %) was assessed against major pests viz; whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, leaf miner, Liriomyza trifolii, aphid, Aphis gossypii, fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera and mite, Tetranychus urticae on tomato (cv. GT-2) under field condition in comparison to untreated control at Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat during Rabi 2017-18. Lowest whitefly (1.50/leaf) and aphid (0.36 grade) populations were observed in thiamethoxam 25 WG 0.008 per cent. Indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cent treated plots showed lowest leaf minor damage (4.01 %) while, spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.028 per cent proved most effective against mite (0.13). Indoxacarb 0.005 per cent was also proved most effective against H. armigera indicating lowest larval population (0.46), fruit damage (8.68 %) and highest yield (38.38 t/ha.). Indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cent and dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 per cent were found most effective against all pests collectively while, λ--cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.003 per cent was found most economical (ICBR 1:8.39) followed by indoxacarb 0.005 per cent (1:6.87). Terminal residues of most effective insecticides (indoxacarb and dimethoate) were assessed under laboratory condition using QuEChERS method which indicated accurate (70 to 120 %) and precise recovery (< 20 %) and sensitivity (LOQ < MRL) for the determination of terminal residues of indoxacarb (0.101 μg/g) and dimethoate (<LOQ, 0.02 μg/g) in tomato which were below MRL at harvest stage. So, it can be summarized that indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cent and dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 per cent did not pose any residue problem when harvested on or after 7th day after application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam gave the lowest whitefly population, 1.50/leaf.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25 WG 0.008 per cente0
- Interactor
- whiteflye0pest
- Outcome
- whiteflye0
- Direction
- Loweste0
- Value
- 1.50/leafe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lowest whitefly (1.50/leaf) and aphid (0.36 grade) populations were observed in thiamethoxam 25 WG 0.008 per cent”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam gave the lowest aphid population, 0.36 grade.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25 WG 0.008 per cente0
- Interactor
- aphide0pest
- Outcome
- aphide0
- Direction
- Loweste0
- Value
- 0.36 gradee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lowest whitefly (1.50/leaf) and aphid (0.36 grade) populations were observed in thiamethoxam 25 WG 0.008 per cent”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb gave the lowest leaf miner damage, 4.01%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cente0
- Outcome
- leaf minor damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 4.01 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cent treated plots showed lowest leaf minor damage (4.01 %)”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Spiromesifen was most effective against mites, at 0.13.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.028 per cente0
- Interactor
- mitee0pest
- Outcome
- mitee0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Value
- 0.13e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.028 per cent proved most effective against mite (0.13)”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb gave the lowest H. armigera larval population, 0.46.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 0.005 per cente0
- Interactor
- H. armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae0pest - Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 0.46e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Indoxacarb 0.005 per cent was also proved most effective against H. armigera indicating lowest larval population (0.46), fruit damage (8.68 %) and highest yield (38.38 t/ha.)”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb gave the lowest fruit damage, 8.68%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 0.005 per cente0
- Interactor
- H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
- Outcome
- fruit damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 8.68 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indoxacarb 0.005 per cent was also proved most effective against H. armigera indicating lowest larval population (0.46), fruit damage (8.68 %) and highest yield (38.38 t/ha.)”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb gave the highest tomato yield, 38.38 t/ha.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 0.005 per cente0
- Interactor
- H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 38.38 t/ha.e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indoxacarb 0.005 per cent was also proved most effective against H. armigera indicating lowest larval population (0.46), fruit damage (8.68 %) and highest yield (38.38 t/ha.)”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb was among the most effective against all pests collectively.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cente0
- Outcome
- all pests collectivelye0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cent and dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 per cent were found most effective against all pests collectively”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Dimethoate was among the most effective against all pests collectively.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 per cente0
- Outcome
- all pests collectivelye0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cent and dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 per cent were found most effective against all pests collectively”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Lambda-cyhalothrin was most economical, ICBR 1:8.39.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- λ--cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.003 per cente0
- Outcome
- most economicale0
- Direction
- most economicale0
- Value
- 1:8.39e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“λ--cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.003 per cent was found most economical (ICBR 1:8.39)”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb followed in economy with ICBR 1:6.87.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 0.005 per cente0
- Outcome
- most economicale1
- Value
- 1:6.87e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by indoxacarb 0.005 per cent (1:6.87)”
e1“most economical (ICBR 1:8.39)”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
QuEChERS had accurate recovery of 70 to 120% for terminal residue determination.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- accuratee0
- Value
- 70 to 120 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“QuEChERS method which indicated accurate (70 to 120 %) and precise recovery (< 20 %) and sensitivity (LOQ < MRL) for the determination of terminal residues of indoxacarb (0.101 μg/g) and dimethoate (<LOQ, 0.02 μg/g) in tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
QuEChERS had precise recovery below 20%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- precise recoverye0
- Value
- < 20 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“QuEChERS method which indicated accurate (70 to 120 %) and precise recovery (< 20 %) and sensitivity (LOQ < MRL) for the determination of terminal residues of indoxacarb (0.101 μg/g) and dimethoate (<LOQ, 0.02 μg/g) in tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
QuEChERS sensitivity had LOQ below MRL.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- sensitivitye0
- Value
- LOQ < MRLe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sensitivity (LOQ < MRL) for the determination of terminal residues of indoxacarb (0.101 μg/g) and dimethoate (<LOQ, 0.02 μg/g) in tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb terminal residue in tomato was 0.101 μg/g and below MRL at harvest.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Organ / stage
- harvest stagee0
- Outcome
- indoxacarbe0
- Direction
- belowe0
- Value
- 0.101 μg/ge0
- Comparator
- MRLe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb (0.101 μg/g) and dimethoate (<LOQ, 0.02 μg/g) in tomato which were below MRL at harvest stage”
Claim · model-written summary
Dimethoate terminal residue in tomato was below LOQ, 0.02 μg/g, and below MRL at harvest.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Organ / stage
- harvest stagee0
- Outcome
- dimethoatee0
- Direction
- belowe0
- Value
- 0.02 μg/ge0
- Comparator
- MRLe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb (0.101 μg/g) and dimethoate (<LOQ, 0.02 μg/g) in tomato which were below MRL at harvest stage”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvesting seven or more days after indoxacarb application was considered free of residue problems.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cente0
- Outcome
- did not pose any residue probleme0
- Qualifier
- on or after 7th day after applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cent and dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 per cent did not pose any residue problem when harvested on or after 7th day after application”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvesting seven or more days after dimethoate application was considered free of residue problems.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 per cente0
- Outcome
- did not pose any residue probleme0
- Qualifier
- on or after 7th day after applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC 0.005 per cent and dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 per cent did not pose any residue problem when harvested on or after 7th day after application”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
indoxacarb · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →dimethoate · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.