Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Evaluation of the efficacy of some insecticides against fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato

M Safna; Kumud V Naik; VS Desai; et al.

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Efficacy of some insecticides against fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) infesting tomato” was carried out during rabi season of 2015-16 at Central Experimental Station, Wakawali, Dist.-Ratnagiri. The study revealed that the overall efficacy of pesticides from all the three sprays revealed that the treatment chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.005 per cent was the best treatment which recorded minimum (13.82%) mean fruit infestation and was significantly superior over all other treatments. It was followed by spinosad which recorded 17.39 per cent fruit infestation. The next treatments in descending order of effectiveness were indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.012 per cent, lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.0025 per cent, B. thuringiensis 1.5 g-1, azadirachtin @ 0.003 per cent and quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.025 per cent which recorded 21.64, 23.50, 27.26, 30.51 and 32.70 per cent fruit infestation, respectively. All the above treatments were found to be superior over untreated control which recorded highest fruit infestation (38.65%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.005 per cent gave the minimum mean fruit infestation (13.82%) and was significantly superior to all other treatments.

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.005 per cente1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
mean fruit infestatione1
Direction
minimume1
Value
13.82%e1
Comparator
all other treatmentse1
Setting
Central Experimental Station, Wakawali, Dist.-Ratnagirie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“carried out during rabi season of 2015-16 at Central Experimental Station, Wakawali, Dist.-Ratnagiri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.005 per cent was the best treatment which recorded minimum (13.82%) mean fruit infestation and was significantly superior over all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad recorded 17.39 per cent fruit infestation and was superior to the untreated control.

Treatment
spinosade2
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione2
Direction
superiore4
Value
17.39 per cente2
Comparator
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“It was followed by spinosad which recorded 17.39 per cent fruit infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–635 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the above treatments were found to be superior over untreated control which recorded highest fruit infestation (38.65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.012 per cent recorded 21.64 per cent fruit infestation and was superior to the untreated control.

Treatment
indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.012 per cente3
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione3
Direction
superiore4
Value
21.64e3
Comparator
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“The next treatments in descending order of effectiveness were indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.012 per cent, lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.0025 per cent, B. thuringiensis 1.5 g-1, azadirachtin @ 0.003 per cent and quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.025 per cent which recorded 21.64, 23.50, 27.26, 30.51 and 32.70 per cent fruit infestation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–963 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the above treatments were found to be superior over untreated control which recorded highest fruit infestation (38.65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.0025 per cent recorded 23.50 per cent fruit infestation and was superior to the untreated control.

Treatment
lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.0025 per cente3
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione3
Direction
superiore4
Value
23.50e3
Comparator
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“The next treatments in descending order of effectiveness were indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.012 per cent, lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.0025 per cent, B. thuringiensis 1.5 g-1, azadirachtin @ 0.003 per cent and quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.025 per cent which recorded 21.64, 23.50, 27.26, 30.51 and 32.70 per cent fruit infestation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–963 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the above treatments were found to be superior over untreated control which recorded highest fruit infestation (38.65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis 1.5 g-1 recorded 27.26 per cent fruit infestation and was superior to the untreated control.

Treatment
B. thuringiensis 1.5 g-1e3
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione3
Direction
superiore4
Value
27.26e3
Comparator
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“The next treatments in descending order of effectiveness were indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.012 per cent, lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.0025 per cent, B. thuringiensis 1.5 g-1, azadirachtin @ 0.003 per cent and quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.025 per cent which recorded 21.64, 23.50, 27.26, 30.51 and 32.70 per cent fruit infestation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–963 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the above treatments were found to be superior over untreated control which recorded highest fruit infestation (38.65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin @ 0.003 per cent recorded 30.51 per cent fruit infestation and was superior to the untreated control.

Treatment
azadirachtin @ 0.003 per cente3
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione3
Direction
superiore4
Value
30.51e3
Comparator
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“The next treatments in descending order of effectiveness were indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.012 per cent, lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.0025 per cent, B. thuringiensis 1.5 g-1, azadirachtin @ 0.003 per cent and quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.025 per cent which recorded 21.64, 23.50, 27.26, 30.51 and 32.70 per cent fruit infestation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–963 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the above treatments were found to be superior over untreated control which recorded highest fruit infestation (38.65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.025 per cent recorded 32.70 per cent fruit infestation and was superior to the untreated control.

Treatment
quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.025 per cente3
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione3
Direction
superiore4
Value
32.70e3
Comparator
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“The next treatments in descending order of effectiveness were indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.012 per cent, lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC 0.0025 per cent, B. thuringiensis 1.5 g-1, azadirachtin @ 0.003 per cent and quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.025 per cent which recorded 21.64, 23.50, 27.26, 30.51 and 32.70 per cent fruit infestation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–963 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the above treatments were found to be superior over untreated control which recorded highest fruit infestation (38.65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The untreated control had the highest tomato fruit infestation by H. armigera, 38.65%.

Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione4
Direction
higheste4
Value
38.65%e4
Qualifier
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the above treatments were found to be superior over untreated control which recorded highest fruit infestation (38.65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1088 · show in text ↑

azadirachtin · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

quinalphos · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

lambda-cyhalothrin · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.