Paper · 2020 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Evaluation of the efficacy of insecticides and bio-pesticides against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on tomato

Santosh Kumar; Ram Singh Umrao; Alok Kumar; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field studies were carried out for the control of Tomato fruit borer (Helicoverpa armigera) during in Rabi season 2018-19 at Student Instructional Farm-“Insectary”, Department of Entomology, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur. The present investigation to evaluate the efficacy of some insecticides and biopesticides on tomato Azad Type-6 variety was taken and treated against Tomato fruit borer. The climate of Kanpur Nagar is sub-tropical with hot dry summer and severe cool in winter season, we applied chemical insecticide viz. Indoxacarb 14.5SC, Fipronil 5SC, Malathion 50EC, Imidacloprid 17.8SL and bio-pesticide viz. Spinosad 45SC & Neemarin 1500PPM at their recommended doses. The data on larval counts were taken from 10 randomly selected plants of each plot treated with pesticides, separately. It was observed that Indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 1.0 ml lit-1 was found to be very effective against Helicoverpa armigera followed by Fipronil 5SC @ 1.0 ml lit-1 in reducing the larval population and showed highest percent reduction in fruit infestation to 85.04% and 81.78% over control. Among the bio-pesticides, spinosad 45SC @ 0.20 ml/lit found to be effective as it showed 72.51% fruit infestation reduction over untreated plot. All the above treatments were found to be superior over untreated control which recorded highest number of larvae and fruit damage per plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb at 1.0 ml lit-1 reduced tomato fruit infestation by 85.04% versus control.

Treatment
Indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 1.0 ml lit-1e0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
85.04%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 1.0 ml lit-1 was found to be very effective against Helicoverpa armigera followed by Fipronil 5SC @ 1.0 ml lit-1 in reducing the larval population and showed highest percent reduction in fruit infestation to 85.04% and 81.78% over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil at 1.0 ml lit-1 reduced tomato fruit infestation by 81.78% versus control.

Treatment
Fipronil 5SC @ 1.0 ml lit-1e0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
81.78%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 1.0 ml lit-1 was found to be very effective against Helicoverpa armigera followed by Fipronil 5SC @ 1.0 ml lit-1 in reducing the larval population and showed highest percent reduction in fruit infestation to 85.04% and 81.78% over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad at 0.20 ml/lit reduced tomato fruit infestation by 72.51% versus untreated plots.

Treatment
spinosad 45SC @ 0.20 ml/lite0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
72.51%e0
Comparator
untreated plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinosad 45SC @ 0.20 ml/lit found to be effective as it showed 72.51% fruit infestation reduction over untreated plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–109 · show in text ↑

fipronil · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.