Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Biology Sciences

Assessment of Insecticides Performance for Managing Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.) Under Field Conditions

Preetu Singh; Kusum Sharma; Rishikesh Mandloi

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most important vegetable crops in India, but its productivity is severely constrained by the fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The pest causes extensive damage by boring into fruits, resulting in yield losses of up to 50% and poor marketability. The present study was conducted during 2022-23 and 2023-24 on the “Assessment of Insecticides Performance for Managing Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.) Under Field Conditions”. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with eleven treatments and three replications. Tested formulations included Cyantraniliprole, Flubendiamide, Novaluron, Quinalphos, Fluxametamide, Indoxacarb, Phosalone, Chlorantraniliprole, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Azadirachtin, and an untreated control. Pre- and post-treatment observations were recorded on larval populations and fruit damage. Results across both years revealed that Chlorantraniliprole (18.5 SC at 150 ml/ha) consistently achieved the greatest reduction in larval populations and fruit damage, with mean infestation levels of only 6-8%. Indoxacarb (14.5 SC at 500 ml/ha) and Flubendiamide (20 WG at 100 ml/ha) also performed effectively, recording fruit damage between 10-18%. Fluxametamide provided moderate control, while conventional insecticides such as Quinalphos, Phosalone, and Lambda-cyhalothrin showed only partial suppression. Azadirachtin was least effective, with damage levels close to untreated control plots. Overall, the findings confirm that newer chemistries, particularly Chlorantraniliprole, offer superior protection against H. armigera and should be integrated into sustainable pest management programs for tomato cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole achieved the greatest reduction in larval populations across both years.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole (18.5 SC at 150 ml/ha)e0
Interactor
H. armigera L.Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
larval populationse0
Direction
greatest reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results across both years revealed that Chlorantraniliprole (18.5 SC at 150 ml/ha) consistently achieved the greatest reduction in larval populations and fruit damage, with mean infestation levels of only 6-8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole achieved the greatest reduction in fruit damage, with mean infestation of 6-8%.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole (18.5 SC at 150 ml/ha)e0
Interactor
H. armigera L.Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
greatest reductione0
Value
6-8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results across both years revealed that Chlorantraniliprole (18.5 SC at 150 ml/ha) consistently achieved the greatest reduction in larval populations and fruit damage, with mean infestation levels of only 6-8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb performed effectively, with fruit damage between 10-18%.

Treatment
Indoxacarb (14.5 SC at 500 ml/ha)e0
Interactor
H. armigera L.Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Value
10-18%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indoxacarb (14.5 SC at 500 ml/ha) and Flubendiamide (20 WG at 100 ml/ha) also performed effectively, recording fruit damage between 10-18%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide performed effectively, with fruit damage between 10-18%.

Treatment
Flubendiamide (20 WG at 100 ml/ha)e0
Interactor
H. armigera L.Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Value
10-18%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indoxacarb (14.5 SC at 500 ml/ha) and Flubendiamide (20 WG at 100 ml/ha) also performed effectively, recording fruit damage between 10-18%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluxametamide provided moderate control.

Treatment
Fluxametamidee0
Interactor
H. armigera L.Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
moderate controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluxametamide provided moderate control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quinalphos showed only partial suppression.

Treatment
Quinalphose0
Interactor
H. armigera L.Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
partial suppressione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional insecticides such as Quinalphos, Phosalone, and Lambda-cyhalothrin showed only partial suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosalone showed only partial suppression.

Treatment
Phosalonee0
Interactor
H. armigera L.Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
partial suppressione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional insecticides such as Quinalphos, Phosalone, and Lambda-cyhalothrin showed only partial suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda-cyhalothrin showed only partial suppression.

Treatment
Lambda-cyhalothrine0
Interactor
H. armigera L.Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
partial suppressione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional insecticides such as Quinalphos, Phosalone, and Lambda-cyhalothrin showed only partial suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin was least effective, with damage close to untreated controls.

Treatment
Azadirachtine0
Interactor
H. armigera L.Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
damage levelse0
Qualifier
close to untreated control plotse0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azadirachtin was least effective, with damage levels close to untreated control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit Borer (H. armigera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating newer chemistries, particularly Chlorantraniliprole, into sustainable tomato pest management.

Treatment
newer chemistries, particularly Chlorantraniliprolee0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
integrated into sustainable pest management programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, the findings confirm that newer chemistries, particularly Chlorantraniliprole, offer superior protection against H. armigera and should be integrated into sustainable pest management programs for tomato cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1720 · show in text ↑

azadirachtin · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

quinalphos · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

lambda-cyhalothrin · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

flubendiamide · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.