Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif and rabi in 2016-17 and 2017-18 at International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics, Patancheru, Hyderabad to study the influence of tillage practices and residue management practices on yield attributes and yield of maize in maize-based cropping systems under semi-arid tropics. The field experiment was laid out on broad-beds and furrows in a split-split design with four replications under rainfed conditions. Main plot consisted of two tillage practices (minimum tillage and conventional tillage), sub-plot of two crop residue management practices (residue addition and no-residue addition) and sub-sub plot of two cropping systems (Maize-chickpea sequential cropping and maize+pigeonpea intercropping system). The results revealed that yield and yield attributes of maize did not vary significantly due to tillage practices, however, minimum tillage led to considerable yield losses. Among the residue management practices, addition of crop residue recorded significantly higher yield and yield attributes (cob girth, number of grain rows and test weight) as compared to no residue addition. Yield attributes and yield remained non-significant among the two cropping systems.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield and yield attributes did not vary significantly with tillage.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“yield and yield attributes of maize did not vary significantly due to tillage practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum tillage led to considerable maize yield losses.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“minimum tillage led to considerable yield losses”
t0“Of Maize In Maize-Based Cropping Systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding crop residue significantly increased maize yield relative to no residue addition.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“addition of crop residue recorded significantly higher yield and yield attributes (cob girth, number of grain rows and test weight) as compared to no residue addition”
t0“Of Maize In Maize-Based Cropping Systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding crop residue significantly increased maize cob girth, number of grain rows and test weight relative to no residue addition.
- Treatment
- addition of crop residuee0
- Outcome
- cob girth, number of grain rows and test weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no residue additione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“addition of crop residue recorded significantly higher yield and yield attributes (cob girth, number of grain rows and test weight) as compared to no residue addition”
t0“Of Maize In Maize-Based Cropping Systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield and yield attributes did not differ significantly between cropping systems.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Yield attributes and yield remained non-significant among the two cropping systems”
t0“Of Maize In Maize-Based Cropping Systems”
The same questions in other papers
cultivation system · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
151 papers more in this group
See all 155 papers →organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →organic · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.