Paper · 2020 · Notulae Scientia Biologicae

Comparative effects of some soil amendments on the agronomic performance of maize varieties in a low fertile soil

Kolawole E. LAW-OGBOMO; Remande AHMADU; Sunday A. OGEDEGBE

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field study was conducted in cropping seasons to determine the comparative effects of some soil amendments on postharvest soil chemical properties and performance of maize (Zea mays L.) in humid low fertile soil. The experiment was laid out in 3 x 4 split plot arrangement, fitted into a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main plots were maize varieties (‘SUWAN-I-SR’, ‘Oba 98’ and ‘Uselu’ local maize) and the subplots were soil amendments (control, poultry manure, cattle manure and NPK). Data were collected on growth parameters (plant heights (cm), number of leaves, leaf area index and stem girth) at 50% silking stage. At harvest, data were collected on grain yield components and several soil chemical properties. The results showed that the variety had significant (p<0.05) effect on growth and yield performance of maize. Fertilizer application significantly (p<0.05) improved maize vegetative characters. The fertilized plants were higher in all the parameters accessed than the unfertilized plants. ‘SUWAN-1-SR’ had the highest grain yield (2.49 t ha-1). The highest grain yield of 2.22 and 2.11 t ha-1 were produced from plants fertilized with NPK and poultry manure, respectively. Variety significantly (p<0.05) influenced organic carbon, available P, exchangeable acidity (H+ and Al3+). Poultry and cattle manures improved soil fertility through increase in soil pH, organic carbon and exchangeable cations. Since NPK and poultry manure had the highest grain yield, poultry manure could be used as viable option for maize production in low fertile soil environment, due to low cost and for environmental cleanliness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety significantly affected maize growth and yield performance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
varietye0
Outcome
growth and yield performancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the variety had significant (p<0.05) effect on growth and yield performance of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer significantly improved maize vegetative traits relative to unfertilized plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
maize vegetative characterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
unfertilized plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer application significantly (p<0.05) improved maize vegetative characters. The fertilized plants were higher in all the parameters accessed than the unfertilized plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SUWAN-1-SR had the highest maize grain yield at 2.49 t ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
SUWAN-1-SRe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.49 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘SUWAN-1-SR’ had the highest grain yield (2.49 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK produced maize grain yield of 2.22 t ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield of 2.22 and 2.11 t ha-1 were produced from plants fertilized with NPK and poultry manure, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure produced maize grain yield of 2.11 t ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.11 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield of 2.22 and 2.11 t ha-1 were produced from plants fertilized with NPK and poultry manure, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize variety significantly affected soil organic carbon, available phosphorus and exchangeable acidity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Varietye0
Outcome
organic carbon, available P, exchangeable aciditye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variety significantly (p<0.05) influenced organic carbon, available P, exchangeable acidity (H+ and Al3+).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure improved soil fertility through increased soil pH, organic carbon and exchangeable cations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Poultrye0
Outcome
soil pH, organic carbon and exchangeable cationse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poultry and cattle manures improved soil fertility through increase in soil pH, organic carbon and exchangeable cations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure improved soil fertility through increased soil pH, organic carbon and exchangeable cations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
cattle manurese0
Outcome
soil pH, organic carbon and exchangeable cationse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poultry and cattle manures improved soil fertility through increase in soil pH, organic carbon and exchangeable cations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend poultry manure as a low-cost option for maize production on low-fertility soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
maize productione0
Setting
low fertile soil environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“poultry manure could be used as viable option for maize production in low fertile soil environment, due to low cost and for environmental cleanliness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.