Abstract
The high cost of mineral fertilizer in crop production had necessitated an investigation into the optimum fertilizer rate for profitable maize production. The study was conducted in Akure (7°15’N, 5°12’E) in Nigeria in 2007 and revalidated in 2008. The experimental design was a split plot method in a randomized complete block with fertilizer quantity as the main plot and fertilizer placement distance of maize plant as the sub plots. The NPK 15-15-15 fertilizer rates in the main plot were 0,150,200,250 and 300 kg NPK/ha, while distances of application of the maize plants that formed the subplots were 10, 15 and 20 cm. Improved maize growth parameters were observed in plots treated with fertilizers at 300 and 250 kg per hectare and at placement distances of 10 and 15 cm with higher yield and corresponding higher net revenue. The economic analysis confirmed the efficient use of fertilizer to lift small holder maize farming from subsistence levels to a more business-oriented agricultural economy. Key words: Optimum fertilizer use, inorganic fertilizer, soil fertility, maize performance and yield
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Maize growth parameters improved in plots with 300 and 250 kg/ha fertilizer at placement distances of 10 and 15 cm.
- Treatment
- fertilizers at 300 and 250 kg per hectare and at placement distances of 10 and 15 cme1
- Outcome
- maize growth parameterse1
- Direction
- Improvede1
- Setting
- Akuree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“conducted in Akure”
e1“Improved maize growth parameters were observed in plots treated with fertilizers at 300 and 250 kg per hectare and at placement distances of 10 and 15 cm with higher yield and corresponding higher net revenue”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield was higher in plots with 300 and 250 kg/ha fertilizer at placement distances of 10 and 15 cm.
- Treatment
- fertilizers at 300 and 250 kg per hectare and at placement distances of 10 and 15 cme1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Setting
- Akuree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“conducted in Akure”
e1“Improved maize growth parameters were observed in plots treated with fertilizers at 300 and 250 kg per hectare and at placement distances of 10 and 15 cm with higher yield and corresponding higher net revenue”
Claim · model-written summary
Net revenue was correspondingly higher in plots with 300 and 250 kg/ha fertilizer at placement distances of 10 and 15 cm.
- Treatment
- fertilizers at 300 and 250 kg per hectare and at placement distances of 10 and 15 cme1
- Outcome
- net revenuee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Setting
- Akuree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“conducted in Akure”
e1“Improved maize growth parameters were observed in plots treated with fertilizers at 300 and 250 kg per hectare and at placement distances of 10 and 15 cm with higher yield and corresponding higher net revenue”
Claim · model-written summary
The economic analysis confirmed efficient use of fertilizer to lift smallholder maize farming from subsistence to a more business-oriented agricultural economy.
- Outcome
- efficient use of fertilizere2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“The economic analysis confirmed the efficient use of fertilizer to lift small holder maize farming from subsistence levels to a more business-oriented agricultural economy”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
1,361 papers more in this group
See all 1,365 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.