Abstract
The field experiment was conducted at two locations, Qlyasan and Kanipanka in Sulaimani governorate, Iraq. The main aim of this research is, to evaluate the impact of adding various levels of Humic Acid and Sulfur rates on maize yield and yield components. Experimental treatments have been organized and a factorial experiment was laid out in a complete randomized block design with three replicates. The treatments included four levels of humic acid, and four levels of sulfur incorporated into the soil. The results showed that the effect was significant at (P < 0.05) on the reproductive growth criteria of a maize plant. The number of kernels per ear, the weight of 100 kernels (g), kernel yield (ton ha -1 ), biological yield (ton ha -1 ), harvest index and relative yield maize plant from both of locations. While the results showed that the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected of the number of kernels per raw from Kanipanka and of the ear diameter (cm) from Qlyasan, it did not affect the number of kernels per raw from Qlyasan location and by the ear diameter (cm) from Kanipanka location.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur levels significantly affected number of kernels per ear at both locations.
Zea maysNot reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e0“The results showed that the effect was significant at (P < 0.05) on the reproductive growth criteria of a maize plant. The number of kernels per ear, the weight of 100 kernels (g), kernel yield (ton ha -1 ), biological yield (ton ha -1 ), harvest index and relative yield maize plant from both of locations.”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur levels significantly affected weight of 100 kernels (g) at both locations.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e0“The results showed that the effect was significant at (P < 0.05) on the reproductive growth criteria of a maize plant. The number of kernels per ear, the weight of 100 kernels (g), kernel yield (ton ha -1 ), biological yield (ton ha -1 ), harvest index and relative yield maize plant from both of locations.”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur levels significantly affected kernel yield (ton ha -1 ) at both locations.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e0“The results showed that the effect was significant at (P < 0.05) on the reproductive growth criteria of a maize plant. The number of kernels per ear, the weight of 100 kernels (g), kernel yield (ton ha -1 ), biological yield (ton ha -1 ), harvest index and relative yield maize plant from both of locations.”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur levels significantly affected biological yield (ton ha -1 ) at both locations.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e0“The results showed that the effect was significant at (P < 0.05) on the reproductive growth criteria of a maize plant. The number of kernels per ear, the weight of 100 kernels (g), kernel yield (ton ha -1 ), biological yield (ton ha -1 ), harvest index and relative yield maize plant from both of locations.”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur levels significantly affected harvest index at both locations.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e0“The results showed that the effect was significant at (P < 0.05) on the reproductive growth criteria of a maize plant. The number of kernels per ear, the weight of 100 kernels (g), kernel yield (ton ha -1 ), biological yield (ton ha -1 ), harvest index and relative yield maize plant from both of locations.”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur levels significantly affected relative yield maize plant at both locations.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e0“The results showed that the effect was significant at (P < 0.05) on the reproductive growth criteria of a maize plant. The number of kernels per ear, the weight of 100 kernels (g), kernel yield (ton ha -1 ), biological yield (ton ha -1 ), harvest index and relative yield maize plant from both of locations.”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur significantly affected number of kernels per raw at Kanipanka.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected of the number of kernels per raw from Kanipanka and of the ear diameter (cm) from Qlyasan, it did not affect the number of kernels per raw from Qlyasan location and by the ear diameter (cm) from Kanipanka location”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur significantly affected ear diameter (cm) at Qlyasan.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected of the number of kernels per raw from Kanipanka and of the ear diameter (cm) from Qlyasan, it did not affect the number of kernels per raw from Qlyasan location and by the ear diameter (cm) from Kanipanka location”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur did not significantly affect number of kernels per raw at Qlyasan.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected of the number of kernels per raw from Kanipanka and of the ear diameter (cm) from Qlyasan, it did not affect the number of kernels per raw from Qlyasan location and by the ear diameter (cm) from Kanipanka location”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid and sulfur did not significantly affect ear diameter (cm) at Kanipanka.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e1“the humic acid and sulfur application significantly affected of the number of kernels per raw from Kanipanka and of the ear diameter (cm) from Qlyasan, it did not affect the number of kernels per raw from Qlyasan location and by the ear diameter (cm) from Kanipanka location”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 221 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
249 papers more in this group
See all 253 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.