Paper · 2020 · South African Journal of Botany

Fertilizer adaptive bacteria Acidovorax valerianellae and Sinorhizobium fredii in integrated nutrient management of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)

Rajyavardhan Arya; Chitra Pandey; Shrivardhan Dheeman; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting (Indole acetic acid producing, phosphate solubilizing and siderophore producing) and chemical fertilizer adaptive variants of endophyte Acidovorax valerianellae CCR1 (JQ424873) with cross nodulating Sinorhizobium fredii SSR1 (JQ424873) were blended with a half dose of fertilizers for integrated nutrient management (INM) to enhance the productivity of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). Plant attributes showed enhancement in the growth of pigeon pea when used with lower concentration of urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP), muriate of potash (MOP) and gypsum, termed as inducer doses determined by sub-lethal concentration (LC50). Plant parameters described as early and late phase of growth (days after sowing; DAS) were enhanced significantly as compared to control and found to be statistically significant. The enhanced plant growth and yield parameters revealed integrated effect of SSR1 and CCR1 when blended with a half dose of chemical fertilizers. The recommended dose of chemical fertilizers attained about 20% increase in yield over control whereas, blend of SSR1 and CCR1 reduced (half) dose of chemical fertilizers enhanced the average yield of the plant by 49–40% over the control. Thus, it is propounded that the increase in the pigeon pea production with the use of fertilizer adaptive endophyte and rhizobia was highly positive. The chemotaxis phenomenon proved both the bacteria as a voracious root colonizer, thereby improving the plant growth directly, hence, these were redefined as fertilizer adaptive bacteria (FAB).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower fertilizer concentrations with bacterial variants enhanced pigeon pea growth.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
lower concentration of urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP), muriate of potash (MOP) and gypsume0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant attributes showed enhancement in the growth of pigeon pea when used with lower concentration of urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP), muriate of potash (MOP) and gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early and late growth parameters improved significantly relative to control.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
early and late phase of growthe0
Outcome
early and late phase of growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant parameters described as early and late phase of growth (days after sowing; DAS) were enhanced significantly as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The blend of SSR1 and CCR1 with half-dose fertilizers enhanced growth and yield parameters.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
SSR1 and CCR1 when blended with a half dose of chemical fertilizerse0
Interactor
SSR1e0symbiont
Second interactor
CCR1e0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enhanced plant growth and yield parameters revealed integrated effect of SSR1 and CCR1 when blended with a half dose of chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended fertilizer dose raised yield about 20% over control.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
recommended dose of chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The recommended dose of chemical fertilizers attained about 20% increase in yield over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SSR1 and CCR1 blend with half-dose fertilizer raised mean yield 49–40% over control.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
blend of SSR1 and CCR1 reduced (half) dose of chemical fertilizerse0
Interactor
SSR1e0symbiont
Second interactor
CCR1e0symbiont
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
49–40%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blend of SSR1 and CCR1 reduced (half) dose of chemical fertilizers enhanced the average yield of the plant by 49–40% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemotaxis showed both bacteria to be root colonizers.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Interactor
SSR1e2symbionte0
Second interactor
CCR1e2symbionte0
Outcome
root colonizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemotaxis phenomenon proved both the bacteria as a voracious root colonizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–145 · show in text ↑
e2

“integrated effect of SSR1 and CCR1 when blended with a half dose of chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–971 · show in text ↑

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

lime · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.