Abstract
Abstract Rice production in Riau Province is lower than demand. One of the efforts made is the use of organic fertilizer based on organic liquid waste, in addition to reducing the use of inorganic fertilizers. The method that can be applied to support rice yield is the use of cellulolytic bacterial consortium applications. This study aimed to finding out the formulation and dose of biological fertilizer based on cellulolytic bacteria based on the organic liquid waste that was good for growth and yield of upland rice. This research used a Completely Randomized Design which consisted of 12 treatments, namely of biofertilizer of rice washing water, biofertilizer of coconut water, biofertilizer of wastewater tofu, biofertilizer of palm oil mill with doses 5, 10, 15 ml. The result showed that all biofertilizers based on organic wastewater cellulolytic consortium could provide varied results on all parameters of observation so that all biological fertilizers could be applied to upland rice plants with the use of inorganic fertilizers at half the recommended dose. Biofertilizers from rice washing water with a dose of 10 ml gave a good response to the growth and yield of upland rice compared with other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Organic wastewater cellulolytic consortium biofertilizers produced varied responses across measured parameters.
- Taxon
- upland rice plants
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- all biofertilizers based on organic wastewater cellulolytic consortiume0
- Outcome
- all parameters of observatione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The result showed that all biofertilizers based on organic wastewater cellulolytic consortium could provide varied results on all parameters of observation so that all biological fertilizers could be applied to upland rice plants with the use of inorganic fertilizers at half the recommended dose.”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors concluded the biofertilizers can be applied with half the recommended inorganic fertilizer dose.
- Taxon
- upland rice plants
Oryza sativae0
- Outcome
- all biological fertilizers could be applied to upland rice plants with the use of inorganic fertilizers at half the recommended dosee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The result showed that all biofertilizers based on organic wastewater cellulolytic consortium could provide varied results on all parameters of observation so that all biological fertilizers could be applied to upland rice plants with the use of inorganic fertilizers at half the recommended dose.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice washing water biofertilizer at 10 ml gave a good growth and yield response relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- upland rice
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Biofertilizers from rice washing water with a dose of 10 mle0
- Outcome
- growth and yield of upland ricee0
- Direction
- good responsee0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Biofertilizers from rice washing water with a dose of 10 ml gave a good response to the growth and yield of upland rice compared with other treatments.”
The same questions in other papers
processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
110 papers more in this group
See all 114 papers →inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
414 papers more in this group
See all 418 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.