Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Plastic Film Mulching Sustains High Maize (Zea mays L.) Grain Yield and Maintains Soil Water Balance in Semiarid Environment

Ming Li; Kaiping Zhang; Ibrahim M. Eldoma; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ridge–furrow cultivation with plastic film mulching has been widely used for many years to increase crop yields in semiarid regions. The long-term effects of plastic mulching on crop yield and soil water balance need to be seriously considered to assess the sustainability of this widely used field management technique. A seven-year maize field experiment was conducted during 2012–2018 to estimate the yield sustainability and soil water balance with two treatments—mulching (yes; no) and nitrogen fertilization (yes; no). This resulted in the following four groups—no film mulching, no N application (M0N0); film mulching, no N application (M1N0); no film mulching, N application (M0N1); film mulching and N application (M1N1). Our results show that plastic mulching significantly increased maize yield. A combination of mulching and nitrogen application had the highest sustainability yield index (SYI) of 0.75, which was higher than the other three treatments, with SYI values of 0.31, 0.33, and 0.39, respectively. Plastic film mulching increased soil water content and water storage in both the sowing and harvesting periods and did not cause the formation of dry soil layers. Precipitation storage efficiency (PSE) in the nongrowing season played a key role in maintaining the soil water balance and it was positively affected by plastic film mulching. Our research indicates that plastic mulching and N application could maintain maize yield sustainability and the soil water balance of agriculture in semiarid regions. In addition, we highlight the importance of nongrowing season precipitation, and thus, we suggest that mulching the field land with plastic film throughout the whole year should be adopted by farmers to store more precipitation, which is important to crop growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching significantly increased maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching significantly increased maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with nitrogen had the highest sustainability yield index, 0.75, compared with the other three treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mulching and nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
sustainability yield index (SYI)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.75e0
Qualifier
SYI values of 0.31, 0.33, and 0.39e0
Comparator
the other three treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of mulching and nitrogen application had the highest sustainability yield index (SYI) of 0.75, which was higher than the other three treatments, with SYI values of 0.31, 0.33, and 0.39, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic film mulching increased soil water content and storage at sowing and harvest.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
soil water content and water storagee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both the sowing and harvesting periodse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic film mulching increased soil water content and water storage in both the sowing and harvesting periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic film mulching did not cause dry soil layers.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
formation of dry soil layerse0
Direction
did not causee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic film mulching increased soil water content and water storage in both the sowing and harvesting periods and did not cause the formation of dry soil layers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nongrowing season precipitation storage efficiency played a key role in soil water balance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
soil water balancee0
Qualifier
nongrowing seasone0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Precipitation storage efficiency (PSE) in the nongrowing season played a key role in maintaining the soil water balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic film mulching positively affected nongrowing season precipitation storage efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
Precipitation storage efficiency (PSE)e0
Direction
positively affectede0
Qualifier
nongrowing seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Precipitation storage efficiency (PSE) in the nongrowing season played a key role in maintaining the soil water balance and it was positively affected by plastic film mulching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend year round plastic film mulching to store more precipitation for crop growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
mulching the field land with plastic film throughout the whole yeare0
Qualifier
store more precipitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we suggest that mulching the field land with plastic film throughout the whole year should be adopted by farmers to store more precipitation, which is important to crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1791 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑

mulching · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

112 papers: 97 positive, 15 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.