Paper · 2010 · Plant Soil and Environment

Irrigation regimes affect early root development, shoot growth and yields of maize (Zea mays L.) in tropical minor seasons

U.R. Sangakkara; P. Amarasekera; P. Stamp

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Moisture stress is an important factor affecting field-grown maize in the tropics, especially in the minor dry seasons, and irrigation is required for successful crop growth and yields. Field experiments evaluated the impact of four irrigation regimes ranging from 3 to 21-day intervals on growth of maize (Zea mays L.) roots and shoots at critical stages and on seed yields when compared to those of irrigated maize plants in two minor seasons at Sri Lanka. While surface wetting at planting induced germination in all treatments, growth of seminal and first-order lateral roots was enhanced by increasing irrigation intervals. Relative water contents were similar at irrigation intervals of 3, 7 and 14 days and declined thereafter. At anthesis, root length and weight densities indicated the greater penetration into soil layers with increasing intervals of water supply. The highest yields were at 7 and 14-day irrigation intervals thus illustrating that regular water supply in minor dry seasons may be detrimental for maize growth and yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals enhanced growth of seminal and first-order lateral roots of maize compared with irrigated plants.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
ranging from 3 to 21-day intervalse0
Outcome
growth of seminal and first-order lateral rootse1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
irrigated maize plantse5
Setting
Sri Lankae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments evaluated the impact of four irrigation regimes ranging from 3 to 21-day intervals on growth of maize (Zea mays L.) roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–336 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of seminal and first-order lateral roots was enhanced by increasing irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–627 · show in text ↑
e5

“when compared to those of irrigated maize plants in two minor seasons at Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest maize seed yields occurred at 7 and 14-day irrigation intervals.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
7 and 14-day irrigation intervalse2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments evaluated the impact of four irrigation regimes ranging from 3 to 21-day intervals on growth of maize (Zea mays L.) roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–336 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yields were at 7 and 14-day irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water contents of maize were similar at 3, 7 and 14-day irrigation intervals and declined thereafter.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
irrigation intervals of 3, 7 and 14 dayse3
Outcome
Relative water contentse3
Direction
similare3
Qualifier
declined thereaftere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments evaluated the impact of four irrigation regimes ranging from 3 to 21-day intervals on growth of maize (Zea mays L.) roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–336 · show in text ↑
e3

“Relative water contents were similar at irrigation intervals of 3, 7 and 14 days and declined thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–733 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation intervals was associated with greater penetration of maize roots into soil layers at anthesis.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
increasing intervals of water supplye4
Outcome
penetration into soil layerse4
Direction
greatere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments evaluated the impact of four irrigation regimes ranging from 3 to 21-day intervals on growth of maize (Zea mays L.) roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–336 · show in text ↑
e4

“At anthesis, root length and weight densities indicated the greater penetration into soil layers with increasing intervals of water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–873 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.