Paper · 2020 · Journal of Fungi

Integrated Management of Aphis craccivora in Cowpea Using Intercropping and Entomopathogenic Fungi under Field Conditions

Allan Mweke; Komivi Senyo Akutse; Christian Ulrichs; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora, is a major cowpea pest. Cowpea–cereal intercrop alone does not effectively manage the pest. Use of pesticides in intercrop leads to health and environmental risks. Fungal-based biopesticides offer a better option because they are environment- and consumer-friendly. This study assessed the combined effect of Metarhizium anisopliae ICIPE 62 and cowpea–maize intercrop against A. craccivora under six treatments: (1) untreated cowpea monocrop, (2) untreated cowpea–maize intercrop, (3) cowpea monocrop + ICIPE 62, (4) cowpea–maize intercrop + ICIPE 62, (5) cowpea monocrop + Duduthrin insecticide, and (6) cowpea–maize intercrop + Duduthrin during three seasons (long rainy/cold and dry/short rainy). In the cold and dry season, cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/cowpea damage, whereas the leaf yield was comparable to cowpea monocrop treated with ICIPE 62. In the short rainy season, the cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/damage, whereas leaf yield was similar to cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 in the cold and dry season. Duduthrin in monocrop and intercrop did not reduce aphid infestation/cowpea damage levels in all the seasons. Although the efficacy of M. anisopliae ICIPE 62-based biopesticide could be affected by seasons, it successfully controlled aphid population in cowpea–maize intercrop under field conditions without affecting aphid-associated natural enemies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the cold and dry season, cowpea-maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 had the lowest aphid infestation and cowpea damage.

Treatment
cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62e1
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Second interactor
ICIPE 62e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infestation/cowpea damagee1
Direction
loweste1
Qualifier
In the cold and dry seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aphis craccivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the cold and dry season, cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/cowpea damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the cold and dry season, leaf yield of the intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 was comparable to cowpea monocrop treated with ICIPE 62.

Treatment
cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62e1
Interactor
ICIPE 62e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf yielde1
Direction
comparablee1
Qualifier
In the cold and dry seasone1
Comparator
cowpea monocrop treated with ICIPE 62e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the cold and dry season, cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/cowpea damage, whereas the leaf yield was comparable to cowpea monocrop treated with ICIPE 62”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the short rainy season, cowpea-maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 had the lowest aphid infestation and damage.

Treatment
cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62e1
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Second interactor
ICIPE 62e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infestation/damagee1
Direction
loweste1
Qualifier
In the short rainy seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aphis craccivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the short rainy season, the cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the short rainy season, leaf yield of the ICIPE 62-treated intercrop was similar to that of the same treatment in the cold and dry season.

Treatment
cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62e1
Interactor
ICIPE 62e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf yielde1
Direction
similare1
Qualifier
In the short rainy seasone1
Comparator
cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 in the cold and dry seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the short rainy season, the cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/damage, whereas leaf yield was similar to cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 in the cold and dry season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Duduthrin insecticide in monocrop and intercrop did not reduce aphid infestation or cowpea damage in any season.

Treatment
Duduthrin in monocrop and intercrope1
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid infestation/cowpea damage levelse1
Direction
did not reducee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Duduthrin in monocrop and intercrop did not reduce aphid infestation/cowpea damage levels in all the seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1263 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The efficacy of the M. anisopliae ICIPE 62 biopesticide could be affected by season.

Treatment
seasonse1
Interactor
M. anisopliae ICIPE 62Metarhizium anisopliaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
efficacy of M. anisopliae ICIPE 62-based biopesticidee1

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Although the efficacy of M. anisopliae ICIPE 62-based biopesticide could be affected by seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M. anisopliae ICIPE 62 biopesticide successfully controlled the aphid population in cowpea-maize intercrop under field conditions.

Treatment
M. anisopliae ICIPE 62-based biopesticidee1
Interactor
aphide1pest
Second interactor
M. anisopliae ICIPE 62Metarhizium anisopliaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
controllede1
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the efficacy of M. anisopliae ICIPE 62-based biopesticide could be affected by seasons, it successfully controlled aphid population in cowpea–maize intercrop under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biopesticide did not affect aphid-associated natural enemies.

Treatment
M. anisopliae ICIPE 62-based biopesticidee1
Interactor
aphid-associated natural enemiese1other
Outcome
aphid-associated natural enemiese1
Direction
without affectinge1
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“M. anisopliae ICIPE 62-based biopesticide could be affected by seasons, it successfully controlled aphid population in cowpea–maize intercrop under field conditions without affecting aphid-associated natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1505 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

intercropping · Aphis craccivora · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

biocontrol · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.