Abstract
Abstract In order to explore whether reciprocal hybridization can be used to cultivate new varieties of wild vegetable, the experiment used two ecological types (farmland ecotype and mine ecotype) of Solanum photeinocarpum as the experimental material of reciprocal hybridization, and compared the difference of qualities of F1 hybrids and parents. The results showed that the biomass, contents of vitamin C, soluble sugar, total acid, and soluble solids of leaves and stems of the F1 hybrid plants were not significantly different. But the indicators of F1 hybrid were higher than the parents. Among them, mining male × farmland female F1 hybrids has the highest leaf biomass, vitamin C content and soluble sugar content. The highest leaf biomass, vitamin C content and soluble sugar content were increased by 13.70%, 65.90% and 117.26% respectively, compared with the farmland ecotype, and increased by 14.40%, 48.89% and 54.99% respectively, compared with the mine ecotype. It indicated that reciprocal hybridization can effectively increase the biomass and the content of nutrients including vitamin C of F1 hybrids and reciprocal hybridization can be used to get new species of Solanum photeinocarpum .
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf and stem biomass and quality traits of F1 hybrids did not differ significantly.
- Material
- F1 hybrid plantse0
- Organ / stage
- leaves and stemse0
- Outcome
- biomass, contents of vitamin C, soluble sugar, total acid, and soluble solidse0
- Direction
- not significantly differente0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the biomass, contents of vitamin C, soluble sugar, total acid, and soluble solids of leaves and stems of the F1 hybrid plants were not significantly different”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid quality indicators were higher than parental indicators.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the indicators of F1 hybrid were higher than the parents”
Claim · model-written summary
The mining male × farmland female hybrid had the highest leaf biomass, vitamin C, and soluble sugar.
- Material
- mining male × farmland female F1 hybridse0
- Outcome
- leaf biomass, vitamin C content and soluble sugar contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“mining male × farmland female F1 hybrids has the highest leaf biomass, vitamin C content and soluble sugar content”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid leaf biomass increased 13.70% relative to farmland ecotype.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The highest leaf biomass, vitamin C content and soluble sugar content were increased by 13.70%, 65.90% and 117.26% respectively, compared with the farmland ecotype”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid vitamin C content increased 65.90% relative to farmland ecotype.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The highest leaf biomass, vitamin C content and soluble sugar content were increased by 13.70%, 65.90% and 117.26% respectively, compared with the farmland ecotype”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid soluble sugar content increased 117.26% relative to farmland ecotype.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The highest leaf biomass, vitamin C content and soluble sugar content were increased by 13.70%, 65.90% and 117.26% respectively, compared with the farmland ecotype”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid leaf biomass increased 14.40% relative to mine ecotype.
Not reportedTaxonOutcome
Verbatim
e0“increased by 14.40%, 48.89% and 54.99% respectively, compared with the mine ecotype”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid vitamin C content increased 48.89% relative to mine ecotype.
Not reportedTaxonOutcome
Verbatim
e0“increased by 14.40%, 48.89% and 54.99% respectively, compared with the mine ecotype”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid soluble sugar content increased 54.99% relative to mine ecotype.
Not reportedTaxonOutcome
Verbatim
e0“increased by 14.40%, 48.89% and 54.99% respectively, compared with the mine ecotype”