Paper · 2020 · Evolutionary Applications

Natural variation of root lesion nematode antagonism in the biocontrol fungus Clonostachys rosea and identification of biocontrol factors through genome‐wide association mapping

Mudassir Iqbal; Martin Broberg; Deepak Haarith; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Biological control is a promising approach to reduce plant diseases caused by nematodes to ensure high productivity in agricultural production. Large‐scale analyses of genetic variation in fungal species used for biocontrol can generate knowledge regarding interaction mechanisms that can improve efficacy of biocontrol applications. In this study, we performed a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) for in vitro antagonism against the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans in 53 previously genome re‐sequenced strains of the biocontrol fungus Clonostachys rosea . Nematode mortality in C. rosea potato dextrose broth (PDB) culture filtrates was highly variable and showed continuous variation ( p < .001) between strains, indicating a polygenic inheritance. Twenty‐one strains produced culture filtrates with higher ( p ≤ .05) nematode mortality compared with the PDB control treatment, while ten strains lowered ( p ≤ .05) the mortality. The difference in in vitro antagonism against P. penetrans correlated with antagonism against the soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines , indicating lack of host specificity in C. rosea . An empirical Bayesian multiple hypothesis testing approach identified 279 single nucleotide polymorphism markers significantly (local false sign rate < 10 –10 ) associated with the trait. Genes present in the genomic regions associated with nematicidal activity included several membrane transporters, a chitinase and genes encoding proteins predicted to biosynthesize secondary metabolites. Gene deletion strains of the predicted nonribosomal peptide synthetase genes nps4 and nps5 were generated and showed increased ( p ≤ .001) fungal growth and conidiation rates compared to the wild type. Deletion strains also exhibited reduced ( p < .001) nematicidal activity and reduced ( p ≤ .05) biocontrol efficacy against nematode root disease and against fusarium foot rot on wheat. In summary, we show that the GWAS approach can be used to identify biocontrol factors in C. rosea , specifically the putative nonribosomal peptide synthetases NPS4 and NPS5.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode mortality in Clonostachys rosea culture filtrates was highly variable and continuously varied between strains

Outcome
Nematode mortalitye1
Qualifier
indicating a polygenic inheritancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nematode mortality in C. rosea potato dextrose broth (PDB) culture filtrates was highly variable and showed continuous variation ( p < .001) between strains, indicating a polygenic inheritance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–773 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-one Clonostachys rosea strains produced culture filtrates with higher nematode mortality than the PDB control

Treatment
culture filtratese2
Outcome
nematode mortalitye2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
PDB control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Twenty-one strains produced culture filtrates with higher ( p ≤ .05) nematode mortality compared with the PDB control treatment”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 775–902 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten Clonostachys rosea strains lowered nematode mortality

Treatment
ten strainse3
Outcome
the mortalitye3
Direction
lowerede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“while ten strains lowered ( p ≤ .05) the mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–954 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro antagonism against Pratylenchus penetrans correlated with antagonism against Heterodera glycines

Interactor
P. penetransPratylenchus penetranse4pest
Second interactor
Heterodera glycinesHeterodera glycinese4pest
Outcome
in vitro antagonism against P. penetranse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus penetrans
Pratylenchus penetrans · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The difference in in vitro antagonism against P. penetrans correlated with antagonism against the soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1095 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

An empirical Bayesian approach identified 279 SNP markers significantly associated with nematicidal antagonism in 53 Clonostachys rosea strains

Material
53 previously genome re‐sequenced strainse6
Outcome
single nucleotide polymorphism markerse5
Value
279e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“identified 279 single nucleotide polymorphism markers significantly (local false sign rate < 10 –10 ) associated with the trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1334 · show in text ↑
e6

“in 53 previously genome re‐sequenced strains of the biocontrol fungus Clonostachys rosea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–578 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genes in the genomic regions associated with nematicidal activity include membrane transporters, a chitinase and secondary-metabolite biosynthesis genes

Gene
a chitinasee7
Outcome
Genes present in the genomic regions associated with nematicidal activitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Genes present in the genomic regions associated with nematicidal activity included several membrane transporters, a chitinase and genes encoding proteins predicted to biosynthesize secondary metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1538 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene deletion of nps4 and nps5 increased fungal growth and conidiation rates of Clonostachys rosea relative to the wild type

Treatment
Gene deletion strainse1
Gene
nps4 and nps5e1
Outcome
fungal growth and conidiation ratese1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
wild typee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Gene deletion strains of the predicted nonribosomal peptide synthetase genes nps4 and nps5 were generated and showed increased ( p ≤ .001) fungal growth and conidiation rates compared to the wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1740 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deletion strains of Clonostachys rosea showed reduced nematicidal activity

Treatment
Deletion strainse7
Outcome
nematicidal activitye7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Deletion strains also exhibited reduced ( p < .001) nematicidal activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1814 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deletion strains of Clonostachys rosea reduced biocontrol efficacy against nematode root disease

Treatment
Deletion strainse7
Outcome
biocontrol efficacye5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Deletion strains also exhibited reduced ( p < .001) nematicidal activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1814 · show in text ↑
e5

“reduced ( p ≤ .05) biocontrol efficacy against nematode root disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1887 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deletion strains of Clonostachys rosea reduced biocontrol efficacy against fusarium foot rot on wheat

Treatment
Deletion strainse7
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
biocontrol efficacye6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Deletion strains also exhibited reduced ( p < .001) nematicidal activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1814 · show in text ↑
e6

“reduced ( p ≤ .05) biocontrol efficacy against nematode root disease and against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1926 · show in text ↑
e0

“against fusarium foot rot on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1926 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

loss of function · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

loss of function · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

loss of function · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.