Paper · 2020 · Plant Methods

High-throughput three-dimensional visualization of root system architecture of rice using X-ray computed tomography

Shota Teramoto; Satoko Takayasu; Yuka Kitomi; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
147
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: X-ray computed tomography (CT) allows us to visualize root system architecture (RSA) beneath the soil, non-destructively and in a three-dimensional (3-D) form. However, CT scanning, reconstruction processes, and root isolation from X-ray CT volumes, take considerable time. For genetic analyses, such as quantitative trait locus mapping, which require a large population size, a high-throughput RSA visualization method is required. RESULTS: ) RSA (consisting of radicle and crown roots), using X-ray CT. The process flow includes use of a uniform particle size, calcined clay to reduce the possibility of visualizing non-root segments, use of a higher tube voltage and current in the X-ray CT scanning to increase root-to-soil contrast, and use of a 3-D median filter and edge detection algorithm to isolate root segments. Using high-performance computing technology, this analysis flow requires only 10 min (33 s, if a rough image is acceptable) for CT scanning and reconstruction, and 2 min for image processing, to visualize rice RSA. This reduced time allowed us to conduct the genetic analysis associated with 3-D RSA phenotyping. In 2-week-old seedlings, 85% and 100% of radicle and crown roots were detected, when 16 cm and 20 cm diameter pots were used, respectively. The X-ray dose per scan was estimated at < 0.09 Gy, which did not impede rice growth. Using the developed process flow, we were able to follow daily RSA development, i.e., 4-D RSA development, of an upland rice variety, over 3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a high-throughput process flow for 3-D rice RSA visualization by X-ray CT. The X-ray dose assay on plant growth has shown that this methodology could be applicable for 4-D RSA phenotyping. We named the RSA visualization method 'RSAvis3D' and are confident that it represents a potentially efficient application for 3-D RSA phenotyping of various plant species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The workflow took 10 min for CT scanning and reconstruction.

Outcome
CT scanning and reconstructione0
Value
10 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“requires only 10 min (33 s, if a rough image is acceptable) for CT scanning and reconstruction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“to visualize rice RSA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1050 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A rough image could be produced in 33 s.

Outcome
rough imagee0
Value
33 se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“33 s, if a rough image is acceptable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–958 · show in text ↑
e1

“to visualize rice RSA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1050 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Image processing took 2 min.

Outcome
image processinge0
Value
2 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2 min for image processing, to visualize rice RSA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1049 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At two weeks, 85% of radicle roots were detected in 16 cm pots.

Organ / stage
radiclee0
Outcome
radicle and crown roots were detectede0
Value
85%e0
Qualifier
16 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2-week-old seedlings, 85% and 100% of radicle and crown roots were detected, when 16 cm and 20 cm diameter pots were used, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“to visualize rice RSA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1050 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At two weeks, 100% of crown roots were detected in 20 cm pots.

Organ / stage
crown rootse0
Outcome
radicle and crown roots were detectede0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
20 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2-week-old seedlings, 85% and 100% of radicle and crown roots were detected, when 16 cm and 20 cm diameter pots were used, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“to visualize rice RSA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The scan X-ray dose was below 0.09 Gy.

Outcome
X-ray dose per scane0
Value
< 0.09 Gye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The X-ray dose per scan was estimated at < 0.09 Gy, which did not impede rice growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The X-ray dose did not impede rice growth.

Treatment
X-ray dose per scane0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
did not impedee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The X-ray dose per scan was estimated at < 0.09 Gy, which did not impede rice growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1374 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The workflow enabled daily 4D imaging of an upland rice variety for more than three weeks.

Material
upland rice varietye0
Outcome
daily RSA developmente0
Value
3 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we were able to follow daily RSA development, i.e., 4-D RSA development, of an upland rice variety, over 3 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1521 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

84 papers: 22 positive, 62 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.