Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Performance of wheat varieties at different levels of irrigation

Dasharath Singh; M Devender Reddy; Girish Pandey; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment on Performance of wheat varieties to different levels of irrigation was conducted at School of Agriculture, ITM University, Gwalior, M.P. during the winter season of 2015-16. The experiment comprised of three irrigation levels as main treatments and five varieties as sub treatments in split plot design with three replications. The yield improved with irrigation in all the varieties. The increase in frequency of irrigation increased the grain yield. Under no irrigation, variety, Lok-1 gave significantly higher grain yield as compared to other varieties. Under two irrigations, variety GW-366 produced significantly higher grain yield over other varieties - RVW-4106, MP-4010 and Lok-1 and statistically at par with variety MP1203. In treatment where four Irrigations were applied at critical stages (i.e. 20, 40, 60 & 80 DAS) highest grain yield was noted in variety GW-366 which was closely followed by MP-1203 and both these varieties were significantly superior over rest of three varieties at this level of irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield improved with irrigation in all the varieties.

Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield improved with irrigation in all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation frequency increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
frequency of irrigatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in frequency of irrigation increased the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–465 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under no irrigation, variety Lok-1 gave significantly higher grain yield than the other varieties.

Material
Lok-1e1
Treatment
no irrigatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
other varietiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under no irrigation, variety, Lok-1 gave significantly higher grain yield as compared to other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–571 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under two irrigations, variety GW-366 produced significantly higher grain yield than RVW-4106, MP-4010 and Lok-1.

Material
GW-366e1
Treatment
Under two irrigationse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
RVW-4106, MP-4010 and Lok-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under two irrigations, variety GW-366 produced significantly higher grain yield over other varieties - RVW-4106, MP-4010 and Lok-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–703 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under two irrigations, variety GW-366 was statistically at par with variety MP1203 in grain yield.

Material
GW-366e1
Treatment
Under two irrigationse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
MP1203e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under two irrigations, variety GW-366 produced significantly higher grain yield over other varieties - RVW-4106, MP-4010 and Lok-1 and statistically at par with variety MP1203”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–748 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With four irrigations at critical stages, variety GW-366 had the highest grain yield, closely followed by MP-1203.

Material
GW-366e1
Treatment
four Irrigations were applied at critical stages (i.e. 20, 40, 60 & 80 DAS)e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
MP-1203e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment where four Irrigations were applied at critical stages (i.e. 20, 40, 60 & 80 DAS) highest grain yield was noted in variety GW-366 which was closely followed by MP-1203”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–930 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With four irrigations, GW-366 and MP-1203 were both significantly superior to the other three varieties in grain yield.

Material
GW-366e1
Treatment
four Irrigationse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
rest of three varietiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment where four Irrigations were applied at critical stages (i.e. 20, 40, 60 & 80 DAS) highest grain yield was noted in variety GW-366 which was closely followed by MP-1203 and both these varieties were significantly superior over rest of three varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–1012 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.