Paper · 2020 · Pest Management Science

Detrimental sublethal effects hamper the effective use of natural and chemical pesticides in combination with a key natural enemy of Bemisia tabaci on tomato

Marianne A Soares; Geraldo A Carvalho; Mateus R Campos; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) represents one of the greatest threats to agricultural crops. Chemical control is the primary tool used in integrated pest management (IPM) programs. However, release of the predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae) on tomato plants is a highly recommended control tactic. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a commercial borax plus citrus oil (BCO) product against B. tabaci in the presence and absence of N. tenuis. The synthetic insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin was used as a positive control. We also evaluated the sublethal effects of BCO on the behavior and predation rate of N. tenuis. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that BCO, alone and at its maximum recommended field rate for B. tabaci, was not effective in controlling the pest under laboratory conditions. Application of BCO simultaneous with N. tenuis release did not reduce the increase in the B. tabaci population. Effective control of B. tabaci was achieved using only N. tenuis. However, synthetic lambda-cyhalothrin pyrethroid, used here as a control, caused high pest mortality and led to on-site extinction of N. tenuis, which did not occur for insects exposed to BCO. Lambda-cyhalothrin and BCO significantly affected the foraging behavior of N. tenuis, reducing the predation rate, especially following exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin. CONCLUSION: The insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin achieved satisfactory results in suppressing B. tabaci, but was harmful to N. tenuis. Additionally, lambda-cyhalothrin and BCO affected predator behavior. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BCO alone at the maximum recommended field rate did not control B. tabaci in the laboratory.

Treatment
BCOe0
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
controlling the peste0
Direction
not effectivee0
Setting
laboratory conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“BCO, alone and at its maximum recommended field rate for B. tabaci, was not effective in controlling the pest under laboratory conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous BCO application and predator release did not reduce B. tabaci population increase.

Treatment
Application of BCO simultaneous with N. tenuis releasee0
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Second interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
increase in the B. tabaci populatione0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · Second interactorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of BCO simultaneous with N. tenuis release did not reduce the increase in the B. tabaci population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. tenuis alone effectively controlled B. tabaci.

Treatment
N. tenuise0
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Second interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of B. tabacie0
Direction
Effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · Second interactorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effective control of B. tabaci was achieved using only N. tenuis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda-cyhalothrin caused high pest mortality.

Treatment
lambda-cyhalothrine0
Outcome
pest mortalitye0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“synthetic lambda-cyhalothrin pyrethroid, used here as a control, caused high pest mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda-cyhalothrin caused on-site extinction of N. tenuis.

Treatment
lambda-cyhalothrine1
Interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
on-site extinction of N. tenuise0
Comparator
BCOe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · InteractorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“led to on-site extinction of N. tenuis, which did not occur for insects exposed to BCO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1222 · show in text ↑
e1

“synthetic lambda-cyhalothrin pyrethroid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BCO did not cause on-site extinction of N. tenuis.

Treatment
BCOe0
Interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
on-site extinction of N. tenuise0
Direction
did not occure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · InteractorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“on-site extinction of N. tenuis, which did not occur for insects exposed to BCO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda-cyhalothrin significantly reduced predator foraging and predation rate.

Treatment
Lambda-cyhalothrine0
Interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
predation ratee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · InteractorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lambda-cyhalothrin and BCO significantly affected the foraging behavior of N. tenuis, reducing the predation rate, especially following exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BCO significantly reduced predator foraging and predation rate.

Treatment
BCOe0
Interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
predation ratee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · InteractorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lambda-cyhalothrin and BCO significantly affected the foraging behavior of N. tenuis, reducing the predation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1337 · show in text ↑

lambda-cyhalothrin · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Nesidiocoris tenuis · Bemisia tabaci · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.