Paper · 2020 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Evaluation of several tropical wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) on various water availability in the lowlands

BDR M Farid; A D Nurazika; Y Musa; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Wheat as a cereal crop has a strategic role in supporting food security and to meet human needs on food. Nutritional content of wheat is relatively higher than other cereal plants. This research aimed to study the adaptability, growth, and production of some wheat mutant lines at various water availability in the lowlands. The research was carried out in the Experimental Garden, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Hasanuddin from November 2017 to January 2018. Location of the trial was at an altitude of < 40 meters above sea level with an average temperature of 24 ºC in the morning and 32 ºC in the afternoon. A split plot design was employed in this study with the availability of water set as the main plot and the wheat mutant genotypes as subplots. Three levels of water availability was used, 81-100% field capacity, 61-80% field capacity, and 41-60% field capacity. The wheat mutant genotypes used consisted of 15 genotypes (13 mutants and 2 comparative varieties). The results of the research show that wheat genotypes grown in the lowland that showed better production in restricted water availability (61 - 80% of field capacity) were Nias 250 4.6.2 (0.95 g. plant −1 ), and Nias 350 3.8. 9 (1.10 g.plant −1 ). Whereas in the 41 - 60% of the field capacity, the Nias 250 4.6.2 and Nias 350 3.8.9 produced better yield of 0.40 g.plant −1 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nias 250 4.6.2 had better production at 61 - 80% field capacity, yielding 0.95 g per plant.

Material
Nias 250 4.6.2e0t0
Outcome
productione0t0
Direction
bettere0t0
Value
0.95 g. plant −1e0t0
Qualifier
61 - 80% of field capacitye0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“better production in restricted water availability (61 - 80% of field capacity) were Nias 250 4.6.2 (0.95 g. plant −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nias 350 3.8. 9 had better production at 61 - 80% field capacity, yielding 1.10 g per plant.

Material
Nias 350 3.8. 9e0t0
Outcome
productione0t0
Direction
bettere0t0
Value
1.10 g.plant −1e0t0
Qualifier
61 - 80% of field capacitye0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“better production in restricted water availability (61 - 80% of field capacity) were Nias 250 4.6.2 (0.95 g. plant −1 ), and Nias 350 3.8. 9 (1.10 g.plant −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nias 250 4.6.2 yielded better at 41 - 60% field capacity, producing 0.40 g per plant.

Material
Nias 250 4.6.2e0t0
Outcome
yielde0t0
Direction
bettere0t0
Value
0.40 g.plant −1e0t0
Qualifier
41 - 60% of the field capacitye0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the 41 - 60% of the field capacity, the Nias 250 4.6.2 and Nias 350 3.8.9 produced better yield of 0.40 g.plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nias 350 3.8.9 yielded better at 41 - 60% field capacity, producing 0.40 g per plant.

Material
Nias 350 3.8.9e0t0
Outcome
yielde0t0
Direction
bettere0t0
Value
0.40 g.plant −1e0t0
Qualifier
41 - 60% of the field capacitye0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the 41 - 60% of the field capacity, the Nias 250 4.6.2 and Nias 350 3.8.9 produced better yield of 0.40 g.plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–69 · show in text ↑