Paper · 2020 · Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science

Use of Acetolactate Synthase-Inhibiting Herbicides in Inzen Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench ssp. bicolor)

H. H. M. Bowman

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

Grain sorghum is typically grown as a rotational crop in Arkansas because of its many benefits, one being the effective control of Palmer amaranth through the use of atrazine. However, limited options exist for postemergence (POST) control of weedy grasses within the crop. Inzen™ grain sorghum is the result of a nicosulfuron resistant weedy sorghum biotype cross-bred with a commercial line of grain sorghum. Inzen™ allows for safe use of over-the-top applications of nicosulfuron within the crop. Nicosulfuron is an acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicide, which has historically been used in corn for control of weedy grasses. Experiments were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to (1) evaluate the tolerance of Inzen™ grain sorghum to various herbicides in Weed Science Society of America Group 2 ALS-inhibiting herbicides, (2) evaluate weed control programs utilizing nicosulfuron, and (3) determine the sensitivity of conventional grain sorghum to low rates of nicosulfuron and glufosinate. Results indicate Inzen™ grain sorghum was tolerant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides evaluated when applied directly to the soil prior to crop emergence (PRE). When ALS-inhibiting herbicides were applied to Inzen™ grain sorghum at the V4 growth stage, a high level of resistance was observed to all herbicides, with the exception of bispyribac-Na, which resulted in 20% visible injury and a 35% yield reduction. Additionally, weed control programs utilizing S-metolachlor preemergence and nicosulfuron + atrazine applied POST resulted in a yield increase along with acceptable control of both Palmer amaranth and johnsongrass. Finally, conventional grain sorghum appeared to be most sensitive to low rates of nicosulfuron and glufosinate at V8, flagleaf, or heading growth stages. Yield reductions of up to 96% were observed from rates of nicosulfuron equivalent to 1/10X of a labeled use rate. Nomenclature: Inzen; atrazine; byspyribac; glufosinate; nicosulfuron; S-metolachlor; johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense L. Pers.; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.; corn, Zea mays L.; grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor L. Moench ssp. bicolor

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inzen grain sorghum tolerated evaluated ALS inhibitors applied before emergence.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Material
Inzen™e0
Treatment
ALS-inhibiting herbicidese0
Outcome
tolerante0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inzen™ grain sorghum was tolerant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides evaluated when applied directly to the soil prior to crop emergence (PRE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At V4, Inzen grain sorghum resisted the evaluated herbicides other than bispyribac-Na.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Material
Inzen™e0
Organ / stage
V4 growth stagee0
Treatment
ALS-inhibiting herbicidese0
Outcome
a high level of resistancee0
Qualifier
with the exception of bispyribac-Nae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When ALS-inhibiting herbicides were applied to Inzen™ grain sorghum at the V4 growth stage, a high level of resistance was observed to all herbicides, with the exception of bispyribac-Na”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bispyribac-Na caused 20% visible injury in Inzen grain sorghum at V4.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Material
Inzen™e0
Organ / stage
V4 growth stagee0
Treatment
bispyribac-Nae0
Outcome
visible injurye0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When ALS-inhibiting herbicides were applied to Inzen™ grain sorghum at the V4 growth stage, a high level of resistance was observed to all herbicides, with the exception of bispyribac-Na, which resulted in 20% visible injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bispyribac-Na reduced Inzen grain sorghum yield by 35%.

Taxon
Inzen Grain Sorghumt0
Treatment
bispyribac-Nae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bispyribac-Na, which resulted in 20% visible injury and a 35% yield reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inzen Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor preemergence plus postemergence nicosulfuron and atrazine increased yield.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
S-metolachlor preemergence and nicosulfuron + atrazine applied POSTe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control programs utilizing S-metolachlor preemergence and nicosulfuron + atrazine applied POST resulted in a yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide program acceptably controlled Palmer amaranth.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
S-metolachlor preemergence and nicosulfuron + atrazine applied POSTe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
control of both Palmer amaranthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control programs utilizing S-metolachlor preemergence and nicosulfuron + atrazine applied POST resulted in a yield increase along with acceptable control of both Palmer amaranth and johnsongrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide program acceptably controlled johnsongrass.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
S-metolachlor preemergence and nicosulfuron + atrazine applied POSTe1
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee0weed
Outcome
control of both Palmer amaranth and johnsongrasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acceptable control of both Palmer amaranth and johnsongrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1619 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed control programs utilizing S-metolachlor preemergence and nicosulfuron + atrazine applied POST resulted in a yield increase along with acceptable control of both Palmer amaranth and johnsongrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional grain sorghum was most sensitive to low nicosulfuron rates at V8, flagleaf or heading.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Material
conventional grain sorghume0
Organ / stage
V8, flagleaf, or heading growth stagese0
Treatment
nicosulfurone0
Outcome
most sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional grain sorghum appeared to be most sensitive to low rates of nicosulfuron and glufosinate at V8, flagleaf, or heading growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional grain sorghum was most sensitive to low glufosinate rates at V8, flagleaf or heading.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Material
conventional grain sorghume0
Organ / stage
V8, flagleaf, or heading growth stagese0
Treatment
glufosinatee0
Outcome
most sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional grain sorghum appeared to be most sensitive to low rates of nicosulfuron and glufosinate at V8, flagleaf, or heading growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron at one tenth of its labeled rate reduced conventional sorghum yield by up to 96%.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Material
conventional grain sorghume1
Treatment
rates of nicosulfuron equivalent to 1/10X of a labeled use ratee0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
up to 96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield reductions of up to 96% were observed from rates of nicosulfuron equivalent to 1/10X of a labeled use rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1887 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional grain sorghum appeared to be most sensitive to low rates of nicosulfuron and glufosinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1731 · show in text ↑

atrazine · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nicosulfuron · control · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nicosulfuron · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

atrazine · control · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

37 papers: 27 positive, 10 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

herbicide · disease · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · control · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

herbicide · Sorghum halepense · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.