Paper · 2020 · Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física

Impact of coffee biochar on soil carbon, microbial biomass and enzymatic activities in Semiarid Entisol cultivated with maize

Argemiro Pereira Martins Filho; ERIKA Valente De medeiros; José Romualdo de Sousa Lima; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of biochar can bring benefits such as long-term carbon sequestration and water use efficiency, being an alternative for semiarid regions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the application of coffee biochar on sandy soil on maize growth, chemical, microbial and biochemical attributes in Entisol. The experimental design was completely randomized, distributed in a 2 x 4 + 1 factorial scheme, two types of wastes coffee ground (MCG) and coffee husks (MCH), four doses (4, 8, 12 and 16 Mg ha-1) and control (CONT), without biochar. All treatments received organic fertilization with manure. Coffee biochar applied to sandy soil cultivated with maize, as predicted, increased the total soil C content, mainly coffee husk biochar that increases twice the C content when compared to the control. Nutrient and some enzyme activities of soils were improved with increasing coffee biochar doses. Microbial biomass of soils amended with the biochars MCH16 and MCH12 showed an increase of 100 and 116%, respectively. This study demonstrated a clear response of the soil nutrients, microbial community and enzyme activities change to types and doses of biochar. However, the effects on the actual maize plant growth with these biochar treatments were not significative in the first cycle. Impacto do biochar de café sobre o carbono, biomassa microbiana e atividades enzimáticas de solo arenoso do semi-árido, cultivado com milhoR E S U M OO uso do biochar pode trazer benefícios como o sequestro de carbono a longo prazo e a eficiência do uso da água, sendo uma alternativa para regiões semi-áridas. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o impacto da aplicação de biochar oriundos de resíduos de café aplicado em solo arenoso sobre o crescimento de milho, atributos químicos, microbianos e bioquímicos. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi inteiramente casualizado, distribuído em esquema fatorial 2 x 4 + 1, sendo dois tipos de resíduos de café: borra (MCG) e casca de café (MCH), quatro doses (4, 8, 12 e 16 Mg ha-1) e controle (CONT), sem biochar. Todos os tratamentos receberam adubação orgânica com esterco bovino. O biochar de café aplicado em solo arenoso cultivado com milho, conforme previsto, aumentou o teor total de C no solo, principalmente o biochar de casca de café, que aumentou em dobro do teor de C, comparado ao controle. Os teores de nutrientes e algumas atividades enzimáticas dos solos foram aumentados com o aumento das doses de biochar de café. Solos que receberam os tratamentos MCH16 e MCH12 aumentaram a biomassa microbiana em 100 e 116%, respectivamente. Este estudo demonstrou uma clara resposta dos nutrientes do solo, comunidade microbiana e atividades enzimáticas relativos aos tipos e doses de biochar. Por isso, recomenda-se o uso do biochar de café para o aumento da qualidade de solos arenosos no semi-árido brasileiro.Palavras-chave: Zea mays, enzima extracelular do solo, carbono orgânico total, biomassa microbiana do solo.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee biochar increased total soil carbon content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Coffee biochare0
Outcome
total soil C contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coffee biochar applied to sandy soil cultivated with maize, as predicted, increased the total soil C content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee husk biochar doubled soil carbon content compared with the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
coffee husk biochare0
Outcome
C contente0
Direction
increasese0
Value
twicee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coffee husk biochar that increases twice the C content when compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing coffee biochar dose improved soil nutrient content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing coffee biochar dosese0
Outcome
Nutriente0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient and some enzyme activities of soils were improved with increasing coffee biochar doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing coffee biochar dose improved some soil enzyme activities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing coffee biochar dosese0
Outcome
some enzyme activities of soilse0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient and some enzyme activities of soils were improved with increasing coffee biochar doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCH16 increased soil microbial biomass by 100%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
MCH16e0
Outcome
Microbial biomass of soilse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
100e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial biomass of soils amended with the biochars MCH16 and MCH12 showed an increase of 100 and 116%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCH12 increased soil microbial biomass by 116%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
MCH12e0
Outcome
Microbial biomass of soilse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
116%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial biomass of soils amended with the biochars MCH16 and MCH12 showed an increase of 100 and 116%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee biochar treatments did not significantly affect maize growth in the first cycle.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
biochar treatmentse0
Outcome
maize plant growthe0
Qualifier
first cyclee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects on the actual maize plant growth with these biochar treatments were not significative in the first cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1309 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The Portuguese summary recommends coffee biochar for sandy soil quality.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
uso do biochar de café para o aumento da qualidade de solos arenosose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recomenda-se o uso do biochar de café para o aumento da qualidade de solos arenosos no semi-árido brasileiro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2770–2879 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑

Coffea · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

biochar · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

190 papers: 180 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 180 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

186 papers more in this group

See all 190 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.