Paper · 2016 · IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

MODIFIED MASS SELECTION WITHIN CORN SYNTHETIC VARIETY

F.Y. Baktash

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research was undertaken to evaluate five cycles of modified mass selection to improve grain yield in synthetic corn (Zea mays L.) variety IPA-5018. The selection was carried out in spring and fall seasons, during, 2013-2015 using 10% selection intensity. The five populations obtained after selection and the original population were evaluated. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with five replications. The results were revealed a significant differences among selection cycles in grain yield and some yield components. The cycle five produced highest grain yield (9699.30 kg.ha-1) and increased 34.88% to the original population. The regression of grain yield, number of grains.ear-1 and grain weight to selection cycles were significantly linear and R2 more than 80%. We concluded that the modified mass selection could be used successfully in improving the grain yield and some yield components of corn synthetic varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection cycles differed significantly in grain yield and yield components.

Outcome
grain yield and some yield componentse0
Comparator
selection cyclese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results were revealed a significant differences among selection cycles in grain yield and some yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycle five had the highest grain yield of 9699.30 kg.ha-1.

Material
cycle fivee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9699.30 kg.ha-1e0
Comparator
original populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cycle five produced highest grain yield (9699.30 kg.ha-1) and increased 34.88% to the original population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycle five yield increased 34.88% relative to the original population.

Material
cycle fivee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.88%e0
Comparator
original populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cycle five produced highest grain yield (9699.30 kg.ha-1) and increased 34.88% to the original population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield regressed significantly linearly on selection cycle with R2 above 80%.

Material
selection cyclese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
R2 more than 80%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The regression of grain yield, number of grains.ear-1 and grain weight to selection cycles were significantly linear and R2 more than 80%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per ear and grain weight regressed significantly linearly on selection cycle with R2 above 80%.

Material
selection cyclese0
Outcome
number of grains.ear-1 and grain weighte0
Value
R2 more than 80%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The regression of grain yield, number of grains.ear-1 and grain weight to selection cycles were significantly linear and R2 more than 80%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude modified mass selection can improve grain yield and yield components in synthetic corn.

Treatment
modified mass selectione0
Outcome
improving the grain yield and some yield componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We concluded that the modified mass selection could be used successfully in improving the grain yield and some yield components of corn synthetic varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑