Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Green Synthesized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth in Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Bhupendra Bhaskar Meher; Shivraj Sahu; Shivangi Singhal; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In present study, Zinc Oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) were synthesized from leaf extract of Catharanthus roseus by green synthesis method. The synthesized nanoparticles were characterized by UV-visible spectrophotometry and Dynamic light spectroscopy (DLS) that showed the synthesis of nanoparticles of average size 385 nm. To evaluate the effect of ZnO NPs on seed germination, various concentrations of nanoparticles (20, 50 and 100 ppm) were used for the treatment of wheat seed but there was not observed any significant effect on germination percentage, speed of germination and mean germination time. However, root length, shoot length, seedling length, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, seedling dry weight and seed vigour index (I and II) showed a significant increase at 50 ppm. Further, by increasing the concentration of ZnO NPs (at 100 ppm), a decrease was observed in all parameters which stipulated the toxicity of synthesized nanoparticles at higher concentration. Thus, the results of this study demonstrated that Catharanthus roseus leaf can be used as a good source for green synthesis of ZnO NPs and the treatment of ZnO NPs influenced the seedling growth and Seed vigour index significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc oxide nanoparticles had no significant effect on wheat germination percentage, speed of germination, or mean germination time at the tested concentrations.

Treatment
nanoparticles (20, 50 and 100 ppm)e0
Outcome
germination percentage, speed of germination and mean germination timee0
Direction
not observed any significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“various concentrations of nanoparticles (20, 50 and 100 ppm) were used for the treatment of wheat seed but there was not observed any significant effect on germination percentage, speed of germination and mean germination time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 ppm, nanoparticles significantly increased wheat root, shoot, and seedling lengths.

Treatment
50 ppme0
Outcome
root length, shoot length, seedling lengthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length, shoot length, seedling length, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, seedling dry weight and seed vigour index (I and II) showed a significant increase at 50 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 ppm, nanoparticles significantly increased wheat root, shoot, and seedling dry weights.

Treatment
50 ppme0
Outcome
root dry weight, shoot dry weight, seedling dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length, shoot length, seedling length, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, seedling dry weight and seed vigour index (I and II) showed a significant increase at 50 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 ppm, nanoparticles significantly increased wheat seed vigour indices I and II.

Treatment
50 ppme0
Outcome
seed vigour index (I and II)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed vigour index (I and II) showed a significant increase at 50 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the nanoparticle concentration to 100 ppm decreased all measured wheat seedling parameters.

Treatment
ZnO NPs (at 100 ppm)e0
Outcome
all parameterse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing the concentration of ZnO NPs (at 100 ppm), a decrease was observed in all parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–124 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.