Abstract
Finger millets ((Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) is one of the important small millets cultivated in India under subsistence farming in drylands. Though it is low demanding crop energy involvement is there in profitable raising of finger millet. Increase in energy use in agriculture production at a faster rate in India because of mechanization and enhancing chemical usage. To study the energy use in finger millet cultivation, a field trail was conducted at Bagusala Farm of M.S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology Management, Paralakhemundi, Odisha. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and ten treatments. The treatment comprises of T1: control, T2: FYM @ 4 t ha -1 ,T3: FYM @ 8 t ha -1 , T4: 100% RDF (40:20:20 kg ha -1 of N: P 2 O 5 : K 2 O), T5: 50% RDF + 4 t FYM, T6, 75% RDF + 2 t FYM, T7: FYM 4 t ha -1 + Azospirillum@ 5 kg ha -1 , T8: FYM 8 t ha -1 + Azospirillum@ 5 kg ha -1 , T9: 50% RDF + 4 t FYM + Azospirillum@ 5 kg ha -1 and T10: 75% RDF + 2 t FYM + Azospirillum@ 5 kg ha -1 . The results revealed that all the energy parameters except energy productivity were significantly influenced by different treatments. The highest maximum energy input, gross energy output, net energy and energy intensity in term of economics were recorded maximum with application of 100% RDF and maximum energy use efficiency and energy productivity was noticed with application of FYM 8 t ha -1 + Azospirillum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments significantly influenced all energy parameters except energy productivity.
- Taxon
- Finger millets
Eleusine coracanae1 - Treatment
- different treatmentse0
- Outcome
- all the energy parameters except energy productivitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all the energy parameters except energy productivity were significantly influenced by different treatments”
e1“Finger millets ((Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn)”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 100% RDF gave maximum energy input, gross energy output, net energy and economic energy intensity.
- Taxon
- Finger milletsEleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- application of 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- energy input, gross energy output, net energy and energy intensity in term of economicse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest maximum energy input, gross energy output, net energy and energy intensity in term of economics were recorded maximum with application of 100% RDF”
e1“Finger millets ((Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM 8 t ha -1 plus Azospirillum gave maximum energy use efficiency and energy productivity.
- Taxon
- Finger milletsEleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- application of FYM 8 t ha -1 + Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- energy use efficiency and energy productivitye0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum energy use efficiency and energy productivity was noticed with application of FYM 8 t ha -1 + Azospirillum”
e1“Finger millets ((Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn)”
The same questions in other papers
Azospirillum · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.