Abstract
Agroforestry systems have multifunctional roles in enhancing agronomic productivity, co-production of diversity of food and non-food products and provision of ecosystem services. The knowledge of the performance of agroforestry systems compared with monoculture is scarce and scattered. Hence, the objective of the study was to analyze the agronomic productivity and economic viability of diverse agroforestry systems in Europe. A network of five agroforestry systems integrating arable crops, livestock and biomass trees was investigated to assess the range of agricultural products in each agroforestry system. Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) was used to measure the agronomic productivity, whereas gross margin was used as an indicator for economic viability assessment. LER values ranged from 1.36–2.00, indicating that agroforestry systems were more productive by 36–100% compared to monocultures. Agroforestry gross margin was lower in Denmark (€112 ha−1 year−1) compared to United Kingdom (€5083 ha−1 year−1) and the crop component yielded higher returns compared to negative returns from the tree component in agroforestry. Hence, the study provided robust field-based evidence on agronomic productivity and economic viability assessment of agroforestry systems in diverse contexts for informed decision making by land managers, advisory services, farmers and policymakers.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Agroforestry systems had land equivalent ratios of 1.36–2.00.
Verbatim
e0“LER values ranged from 1.36–2.00, indicating that agroforestry systems were more productive by 36–100% compared to monocultures.”
e1“arable crops, livestock and biomass trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Agroforestry systems were 36–100% more productive than monocultures.
- Taxon
- arable cropse1
- Outcome
- agroforestry systemse0
- Direction
- more productivee0
- Value
- 36–100%e0
- Comparator
- monoculturese0
Not reportedSetting
Verbatim
e0“LER values ranged from 1.36–2.00, indicating that agroforestry systems were more productive by 36–100% compared to monocultures.”
e1“arable crops, livestock and biomass trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Agroforestry gross margin was €112 ha−1 year−1 in Denmark.
Verbatim
e0“Agroforestry gross margin was lower in Denmark (€112 ha−1 year−1) compared to United Kingdom (€5083 ha−1 year−1)”
e1“arable crops, livestock and biomass trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Agroforestry gross margin was €5083 ha−1 year−1 in the United Kingdom.
Verbatim
e0“Agroforestry gross margin was lower in Denmark (€112 ha−1 year−1) compared to United Kingdom (€5083 ha−1 year−1)”
e1“arable crops, livestock and biomass trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop components yielded higher returns than tree components, whose returns were negative.
Verbatim
e0“the crop component yielded higher returns compared to negative returns from the tree component in agroforestry.”