Claim · model-written summary
Agroforestry systems were 36–100% more productive than monocultures.
- Taxon
- arable cropse1
- Outcome
- agroforestry systemse0
- Direction
- more productivee0
- Value
- 36–100%e0
- Comparator
- monoculturese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier
Verbatim
e0“LER values ranged from 1.36–2.00, indicating that agroforestry systems were more productive by 36–100% compared to monocultures.”
e1“arable crops, livestock and biomass trees”
Title
Lisa Mølgaard Lehmann; Jo Smith; Sally Westaway; et al. Sustainability 2020. doi:10.3390/su12135429
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Observation Agroforestry systems had land equivalent ratios of 1.36–2.00.
- Observation Agroforestry gross margin was €112 ha−1 year−1 in Denmark.
- Observation Agroforestry gross margin was €5083 ha−1 year−1 in the United Kingdom.
- Association Crop components yielded higher returns than tree components, whose returns were negative.