Paper · 2020 · Notulae Scientia Biologicae

Effect of plant density on growth and yield attributes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes

Eric B. KOUAM; Alex B. TSAGUE-ZANFACK

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an economically significant seed crop in tropical regions. With the objective of studying the effect of plant density on growth and yield characteristics of common bean, four common bean varieties (‘GLP190S’, ‘NITU’, ‘ECOPALM021’ and ‘NUA99’) collected from IRAD-Cameroon and four plant spacing distances (10 cm x 10 cm, 15 cm x 15 cm, 20 cm x 20 cm and 30 cm x 30 cm) corresponding respectively to four plant density (121, 49, 36 and 16 plants/m2) were evaluated for twelve quantitative traits in a randomly completed block design with three repetitions. ANOVA and correlation analysis were performed. Means values of each trait from the ANOVA analysis was submitted to the Tukey test at 5% probability level. The effect of variety was significant for all the twelve studied traits except the number of seed per plant. Pod length, plant height, number of seeds per pod and 100 seed weights were not affected by plant density while the numbers of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant, biological and seed yield were significantly affected by plant density. Interaction effect of plant variety and plant density on seed yield, biological yield, number of pods per plant and collar diameter was significant. No positive correlation was found between plant density and any of the studied traits. Leaf width, collar diameter, number of functional leaves and number of pods per plant inversely correlated with plant density. At the lowest plant density (16 plant/m2), seed yield and biological yield correlated poorly with related quantitative traits comparing to higher plant densities. From all the studied varieties, only ‘ECOPALM021’ showed the seed yield not affected by plant density. This study also showed that the higher seed yield and important biological yield was at 16 plants/m2 plant density.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety affected eleven of twelve traits but not seeds per plant.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
twelve studied traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect of variety was significant for all the twelve studied traits except the number of seed per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density did not affect pod length, height, seeds per pod or 100 seed weights.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
Pod length, plant height, number of seeds per pod and 100 seed weightse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pod length, plant height, number of seeds per pod and 100 seed weights were not affected by plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected seeds per plant, pods per plant, biomass and seed yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
numbers of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant, biological and seed yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“numbers of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant, biological and seed yield were significantly affected by plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety by density interaction significantly affected yield, pods and collar diameter.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
seed yield, biological yield, number of pods per plant and collar diametere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Interaction effect of plant variety and plant density on seed yield, biological yield, number of pods per plant and collar diameter was significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1249 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No studied traits correlated positively with density.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
any of the studied traitse0
Direction
No positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“No positive correlation was found between plant density and any of the studied traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1336 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf width, collar diameter, functional leaves and pods per plant inversely correlated with density.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
Leaf width, collar diameter, number of functional leaves and number of pods per plante0
Direction
inversely correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf width, collar diameter, number of functional leaves and number of pods per plant inversely correlated with plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1463 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At lowest density, seed and biological yield correlated poorly with related traits.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
lowest plant density (16 plant/m2)e0
Outcome
seed yield and biological yield correlated poorly with related quantitative traitse0
Comparator
higher plant densitiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the lowest plant density (16 plant/m2), seed yield and biological yield correlated poorly with related quantitative traits comparing to higher plant densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ECOPALM021 seed yield was unaffected by plant density.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
ECOPALM021e0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“only ‘ECOPALM021’ showed the seed yield not affected by plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1729 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed and biological yields were highest at 16 plants/m2.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
16 plants/m2 plant densitye0
Outcome
seed yield and important biological yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“the higher seed yield and important biological yield was at 16 plants/m2 plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1845 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 58 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.