Paper · 2013 · Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology

Effect of Resistance Inducing Chemicals on Wheat Leaf Rust Caused by Puccinia triticina

Nour El-Din Soliman; Magdy Saber; Alaa Abd-Elaziz; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The efficiency of some inducing resistance chemicals (IRCs) and systemic fungicide were evaluated in vitro on suppressing the germination of uredospores of Puccinia triticina as well as controlling leaf rust of wheat under greenhouse and field conditions. Different degrees of inhibition to the germinated uredospores of P. triticina were occurred when sprayed the tested IRCs, i.e. ascorbic acid, oxalic acid, sodium salicylate, di-basic potassium phosphate, salicylic acid and benzothiadiazole (BTH) and the systemic fungicide, i.e. propiconazole (Tilt). Furthermore, the used systemic fungicide was more efficient than IRCs in this regard. Spraying two wheat varieties (Giza168 and Giza139) with the tested IRCs and fungicides reduced significantly the severity of leaf rust disease compared with control treatment under greenhouse conditions. On the other hand, spraying the two wheat cultivars under field conditions during 2011/2012 growing seasons in two Governorates (El-Sharkiya and Kafr El-Sheikh) with the tested IRCs and fungicides resulted in a significant decrease in the severity of the disease compared with control treatment. In addition, the tested IRCs were low disease efficient comparing to treatments sprayed with the fungicide. All the tested IRCs resulted in a significant increment in yield components, while the fungicide (Tilt) show low efficient in yield components as compared to the control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested resistance inducing chemicals inhibited Puccinia uredospore germination.

Treatment
tested IRCse0
Interactor
P. triticinaPuccinia triticinae0pathogen
Outcome
germinated uredospores of P. triticinae0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia triticina
Puccinia triticina · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different degrees of inhibition to the germinated uredospores of P. triticina were occurred when sprayed the tested IRCs, i.e. ascorbic acid, oxalic acid, sodium salicylate, di-basic potassium phosphate, salicylic acid and benzothiadiazole (BTH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole was more effective than inducing chemicals at inhibiting uredospore germination.

Treatment
systemic fungicidee0
Interactor
Puccinia triticinaPuccinia triticinat1pathogen
Outcome
more efficiente0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
IRCse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia triticina
Puccinia triticina · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the used systemic fungicide was more efficient than IRCs in this regard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“Puccinia triticina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed chemicals and fungicide reduced wheat leaf rust severity under greenhouse conditions.

Material
Giza168 and Giza139e0
Treatment
tested IRCs and fungicidese0
Interactor
Puccinia triticinaPuccinia triticinat1pathogen
Outcome
severity of leaf rust diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control treatmente0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia triticina
Puccinia triticina · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying two wheat varieties (Giza168 and Giza139) with the tested IRCs and fungicides reduced significantly the severity of leaf rust disease compared with control treatment under greenhouse conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“Puccinia triticina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed chemicals and fungicide decreased wheat leaf rust severity in the field.

Treatment
tested IRCs and fungicidese0
Interactor
Puccinia triticinaPuccinia triticinat1pathogen
Outcome
severity of the diseasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0
Setting
El-Sharkiya and Kafr El-Sheikhe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia triticina
Puccinia triticina · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying the two wheat cultivars under field conditions during 2011/2012 growing seasons in two Governorates (El-Sharkiya and Kafr El-Sheikh) with the tested IRCs and fungicides resulted in a significant decrease in the severity of the disease compared with control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“Puccinia triticina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inducing chemicals controlled disease less effectively than fungicide.

Treatment
tested IRCse0
Interactor
Puccinia triticinaPuccinia triticinat1pathogen
Outcome
low disease efficiente0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
treatments sprayed with the fungicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia triticina
Puccinia triticina · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tested IRCs were low disease efficient comparing to treatments sprayed with the fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“Puccinia triticina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested inducing chemicals significantly increased yield components.

Treatment
tested IRCse0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Direction
incremente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the tested IRCs resulted in a significant increment in yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tilt was less effective for yield components than the control treatment.

Treatment
fungicide (Tilt)e0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Direction
low efficiente0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungicide (Tilt) show low efficient in yield components as compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 232 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

fungicide · Puccinia triticina · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.