Paper · 2020 · Sustainability

Sustainable Weed Control and Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency in Crops through Brassica (Brassica compestris L.) Allelopathy

Raza Ullah; Zubair Aslam; Mansoor Maitah; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Weed–crop competition and reduced soil fertility are some of the main reasons for decreased crop yields in Pakistan. Allelopathy can be applied to combat the problems of environmental degradation by reducing pesticide use and through reduction of herbicide-resistant weeds. A two-year field experiment (2014–2015) was conducted to assess the impact of incorporation of various levels of brassica residues and brassica water extract on the growth of mung bean and soil attributes. Two brassica water extract levels (10, 20 L/ha) and two residue levels (4, 6 t/ha) were tested, and a treatment with no water extract and residue incorporation was used as the control. The results showed that the water extract and residue incorporation had diverse impacts on soil fertility indices and weed dynamics, where treatment with 6 t/ha had more significant impacts. Compared with the control, reductions of 61% in dry weight of weeds and 52% in weed density were observed. After cropping, improved soil properties in terms of available potassium, available phosphorus, soil organic matter, and total nitrogen were higher in the rhizosphere (0–15 cm) soil after the treatments of residue incorporation, i.e., 59–91%, 62–84%, 29–45%, and 52–65% higher than the control, respectively. Meanwhile, alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase concentrations in the rhizosphere soil were 26–41% and 52–74% higher than with the control, respectively. The highest economic return with a high benefit–cost ratio was recorded with residue incorporation. In conclusion, addition of crop residues at 6 t/ha was the most effective and economical treatment with the highest net benefit rate of returns. This approach can provide a potential alternative for implementing sustainable weed control in mung bean with significant improvement in soil properties and can be a part of sustainable and eco-friendly agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue treatment reduced weed dry weight by 61% against the control.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
residue incorporatione2
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
61%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control, reductions of 61% in dry weight of weeds and 52% in weed density were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑
e2

“treatments of residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue treatment reduced weed density by 52% against the control.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
residue incorporatione2
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control, reductions of 61% in dry weight of weeds and 52% in weed density were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑
e2

“treatments of residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation raised available potassium in rhizosphere soil by 59–91%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
available potassiume0
Direction
highere0
Value
59–91%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available potassium, available phosphorus, soil organic matter, and total nitrogen were higher in the rhizosphere (0–15 cm) soil after the treatments of residue incorporation, i.e., 59–91%, 62–84%, 29–45%, and 52–65% higher than the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1271 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation raised available phosphorus by 62–84%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
available phosphoruse0
Direction
highere0
Value
62–84%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available potassium, available phosphorus, soil organic matter, and total nitrogen were higher in the rhizosphere (0–15 cm) soil after the treatments of residue incorporation, i.e., 59–91%, 62–84%, 29–45%, and 52–65% higher than the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1271 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation raised soil organic matter by 29–45%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
soil organic mattere0
Direction
highere0
Value
29–45%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available potassium, available phosphorus, soil organic matter, and total nitrogen were higher in the rhizosphere (0–15 cm) soil after the treatments of residue incorporation, i.e., 59–91%, 62–84%, 29–45%, and 52–65% higher than the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1271 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation raised total nitrogen by 52–65%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
total nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
52–65%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available potassium, available phosphorus, soil organic matter, and total nitrogen were higher in the rhizosphere (0–15 cm) soil after the treatments of residue incorporation, i.e., 59–91%, 62–84%, 29–45%, and 52–65% higher than the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1271 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere alkaline phosphatase was 26–41% higher than control.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
residue incorporatione2
Outcome
alkaline phosphatasee0
Direction
highere0
Value
26–41%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase concentrations in the rhizosphere soil were 26–41% and 52–74% higher than with the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1427 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑
e2

“treatments of residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere dehydrogenase was 52–74% higher than control.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
residue incorporatione2
Outcome
dehydrogenase concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Value
52–74%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase concentrations in the rhizosphere soil were 26–41% and 52–74% higher than with the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1427 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑
e2

“treatments of residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1190 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation produced the highest economic return and benefit–cost ratio.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
economic return with a high benefit–cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest economic return with a high benefit–cost ratio was recorded with residue incorporation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1527 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 6 t/ha residue addition as the most effective and economical treatment.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Outcome
addition of crop residues at 6 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of crop residues at 6 t/ha was the most effective and economical treatment with the highest net benefit rate of returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1672 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–458 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

organic · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.