Abstract
To avoid the risk of crop failure in a dry land, which is poor in organic matter and at the same time can increase the yield of maize and soybeans, intercropping cultivation techniques and the provision of organic materials are needed. This research aimed to determine the effect of plant density on the intercropping pattern of maize soybean inoculated with mycorrhizae and the addition of organic fertilizers to the growth and yield of maize soybean in dryland North Lombok. This research was conducted at Akar-Akar village in Bayan district of North Lombok. The experimental design with Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three blocks and five treatments intercropping patterns, i.e., P1 = 2 rows of corn: 2 rows of soybeans, P2 = 3 rows of corn: 2 rows of soybeans, P3 = 3 rows of corn: 3 rows of soybeans, P4 = 4 rows of corn: 2 rows of soybeans, P5 = 4 rows of corn: 3 rows of soybeans. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) means-tested at a 5% level of significance. The results showed that the intercropping density of 3 maize rows: 3 rows of soybean show the best growth and yield. Growth and yields on intercropping plant density treatment of 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeans gave the highest yields on the wet and dry weight of maize cobs and soybean pods per plant, as well as the wet and dry weight of biomass, maize cobs and soybean pods per plot with the best results if compared to the density of other intercropping plants. The intercropping density of 3 maize rows: 3 rows of soybeans can also increase the number of spores and the percentage of mycorrhizae infections compared to other intercropping treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Three maize rows and three soybean rows gave the best growth and yield among tested densities.
- Treatment
- 3 maize rows: 3 rows of soybeane0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
- Comparator
- density of other intercropping plantse1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the intercropping density of 3 maize rows: 3 rows of soybean show the best growth and yield.”
e1“with the best results if compared to the density of other intercropping plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
The three by three row pattern gave the highest wet and dry weights of maize cobs per plant.
- Treatment
- 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeanse0
- Outcome
- wet and dry weight of maize cobse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- per plante0
- Comparator
- density of other intercropping plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth and yields on intercropping plant density treatment of 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeans gave the highest yields on the wet and dry weight of maize cobs and soybean pods per plant, as well as the wet and dry weight of biomass, maize cobs and soybean pods per plot with the best results if compared to the density of other intercropping plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
The three by three row pattern gave the highest wet and dry weights of soybean pods per plant.
- Taxon
- soybeans
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeanse0
- Outcome
- soybean podse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- per plante0
- Comparator
- density of other intercropping plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth and yields on intercropping plant density treatment of 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeans gave the highest yields on the wet and dry weight of maize cobs and soybean pods per plant, as well as the wet and dry weight of biomass, maize cobs and soybean pods per plot with the best results if compared to the density of other intercropping plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
The three by three row pattern gave the highest wet and dry biomass weights per plot.
- Treatment
- 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeanse0
- Outcome
- wet and dry weight of biomasse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- per plote0
- Comparator
- density of other intercropping plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth and yields on intercropping plant density treatment of 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeans gave the highest yields on the wet and dry weight of maize cobs and soybean pods per plant, as well as the wet and dry weight of biomass, maize cobs and soybean pods per plot with the best results if compared to the density of other intercropping plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
The three by three row pattern gave the highest maize cob weights per plot.
- Treatment
- 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeanse0
- Outcome
- maize cobse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- per plote0
- Comparator
- density of other intercropping plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth and yields on intercropping plant density treatment of 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeans gave the highest yields on the wet and dry weight of maize cobs and soybean pods per plant, as well as the wet and dry weight of biomass, maize cobs and soybean pods per plot with the best results if compared to the density of other intercropping plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
The three by three row pattern gave the highest soybean pod weights per plot.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeanse0
- Outcome
- soybean podse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- per plote0
- Comparator
- density of other intercropping plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth and yields on intercropping plant density treatment of 3 rows of maize : 3 rows of soybeans gave the highest yields on the wet and dry weight of maize cobs and soybean pods per plant, as well as the wet and dry weight of biomass, maize cobs and soybean pods per plot with the best results if compared to the density of other intercropping plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
The three by three row pattern increased mycorrhizal spore number compared with other row patterns.
- Treatment
- 3 maize rows: 3 rows of soybeanse0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee0symbiont
- Outcome
- number of sporese0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- other intercropping treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The intercropping density of 3 maize rows: 3 rows of soybeans can also increase the number of spores and the percentage of mycorrhizae infections compared to other intercropping treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
The three by three row pattern increased the percentage of mycorrhizae infections compared with other row patterns.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 3 maize rows: 3 rows of soybeanse0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee0symbiont
- Outcome
- percentage of mycorrhizae infectionse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- other intercropping treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The intercropping density of 3 maize rows: 3 rows of soybeans can also increase the number of spores and the percentage of mycorrhizae infections compared to other intercropping treatments.”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Glycine max · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Glycine max · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
176 papers more in this group
See all 180 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.