Abstract
This study was conducted in the year 2017-2018 in IGKV farm Raipur, Chhattisgarh to evaluate the long term impact of integrated nutrient management on productivity of Rice. For this study we calculated the different nutrient use efficiency viz. agronomic efficiency, recovery efficiency. The experiment was conducted with ten Treatments in RBD design with four replication. The result showed that the agronomic efficiency, recovery efficiency and factor productivity index were significantly higher with the 50 % NPK + Green manuring treatment over all other treatments. While lowest values of above efficiency were recorded with 100% N fertilizer was applied. Physiologic efficiency was recorded highest in 50% NPK treatment whereas it was at par with 50%NPK+BGA, 100%NPK+Zinc and 100%NPK+FYM treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The 50 % NPK plus green manuring treatment gave significantly higher agronomic efficiency, recovery efficiency and factor productivity index than all other treatments.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- 50 % NPK + Green manuringe0
- Outcome
- agronomic efficiency, recovery efficiency and factor productivity indexe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Assessment of Nutrient Use Efficiency in Long Term Fertilization on Rice Productivity under Vertisol”
e0“The result showed that the agronomic efficiency, recovery efficiency and factor productivity index were significantly higher with the 50 % NPK + Green manuring treatment over all other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
100% N fertilizer alone gave the lowest values of the above efficiencies.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 100% N fertilizere1
- Outcome
- above efficiencye1
- Direction
- lowest valuese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Assessment of Nutrient Use Efficiency in Long Term Fertilization on Rice Productivity under Vertisol”
e1“While lowest values of above efficiency were recorded with 100% N fertilizer was applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Physiologic efficiency was highest in the 50% NPK treatment.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 50% NPKe2
- Outcome
- Physiologic efficiencye2
- Direction
- higheste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Assessment of Nutrient Use Efficiency in Long Term Fertilization on Rice Productivity under Vertisol”
e2“Physiologic efficiency was recorded highest in 50% NPK treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Physiologic efficiency under 50%NPK+BGA, 100%NPK+Zinc and 100%NPK+FYM was at par with that under 50% NPK.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 50%NPK+BGA, 100%NPK+Zinc and 100%NPK+FYMe3
- Outcome
- Physiologic efficiencye2
- Direction
- at pare3
- Comparator
- 50% NPKe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Assessment of Nutrient Use Efficiency in Long Term Fertilization on Rice Productivity under Vertisol”
e2“Physiologic efficiency was recorded highest in 50% NPK treatment”
e3“whereas it was at par with 50%NPK+BGA, 100%NPK+Zinc and 100%NPK+FYM treatment”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- positive
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.