Paper · 2016 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Productivity enhancement of rice through crop establishment techniques for livelihood improvement in Eastern Himalayas

Manoj Kumar; Rakesh Kumar; K.C. Meena; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Performance of three crop establishment methods viz., system of rice intensification (SRI), integrated crop management (ICM) and farmer's practice (conventional rice culture)were evaluated during the year 2014–15 and 2015–16 at farmers field, Longleng District of Nagaland to assess the most suitable establishment methods of rice for higher productivity and profitability. Results revealed that ICM recorded significantly higher grain yield as compared to SRI and the farmers ’practices during both the years. The ICM and SRI method of rice cultivation produced 44.5 and 41.2% higher grain yield as compared to the farmer's practices, respectively. Similarly, the gross returns (Rs.46850 ha−1), net returns (Rs.24730 ha−1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.15) was recorded significantly highest under ICM. Among all crop establishment methods, the farmer's practice recorded least profit. Hence, the existing farmer's practices can be profitably replaced with adoption of ICM and SRI methods of crop establishment under the foot hill of Eastern Himalayas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM yielded significantly more grain than SRI and farmer practice.

Treatment
ICMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SRI and the farmers ’practicese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“ICM recorded significantly higher grain yield as compared to SRI and the farmers ’practices during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM yielded 44.5% more grain than farmer practice.

Treatment
ICMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
44.5e0
Comparator
farmer's practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ICM and SRI method of rice cultivation produced 44.5 and 41.2% higher grain yield as compared to the farmer's practices, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI yielded 41.2% more grain than farmer practice.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
41.2%e0
Comparator
farmer's practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ICM and SRI method of rice cultivation produced 44.5 and 41.2% higher grain yield as compared to the farmer's practices, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–649 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM had the highest gross returns of Rs.46850 ha−1.

Treatment
ICMe0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.46850 ha−1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“gross returns (Rs.46850 ha−1), net returns (Rs.24730 ha−1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.15) was recorded significantly highest under ICM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM had the highest net returns of Rs.24730 ha−1.

Treatment
ICMe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.24730 ha−1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“gross returns (Rs.46850 ha−1), net returns (Rs.24730 ha−1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.15) was recorded significantly highest under ICM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM had the highest benefit cost ratio, 2.15.

Treatment
ICMe0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.15e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“gross returns (Rs.46850 ha−1), net returns (Rs.24730 ha−1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.15) was recorded significantly highest under ICM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmer practice had the least profit.

Treatment
farmer's practicee0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Among all crop establishment methods, the farmer's practice recorded least profit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–883 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend replacing farmer practice with ICM or SRI in the Eastern Himalayan foothills.

Outcome
replaced with adoption of ICM and SRI methodse0
Setting
Eastern Himalayase0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the existing farmer's practices can be profitably replaced with adoption of ICM and SRI methods of crop establishment under the foot hill of Eastern Himalayas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1050 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

ipm · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

43 papers: 43 positive, 0 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.